But what did she lie about. No one has listed one concrete lie. They just say "the whole thing. The whole thing was made up."

You mostly just keep spouting ad hominem attacks. You haven't listed a single conclusive data point.

She wasn't a hooker. She was a stripper. Strippers don't usually end up with violence to their genitals.

Sociopathy and psychopathy are co-morbid disorders. Which are you diagnosing her with?

She went to the hospital to receive treatment for genital injuries and have a rape kit done.

I don't have an opinion. Just a lack of one. I've always thought this was one of the great mishandled cases, for a lot of reasons. The entire thing is a mess.

What are you basing that on? No one's offered any evidence for "she just made everything up."

No, this article roused my interest. So, I've been binge reading a whole bunch of other articles.

No one's actually named a concrete lie she's said. It's just 'common knowledge' that she did lie. That's really confusing to me. Did she lie? Or was she just confused? Nothing seems particularly malicious or like direct lying to me.

Oh my fucking god.

That wouldn't even be the craziest reason someone had lied. A lot of friends don't get involved because they don't want to be involved. In that recent case with the girl who was raped when she was only fourteen, her friend was raped at the same party.

It's clear that there wasn't enough evidence for it to have really even gone to trial. It's pretty obvious that the wrong people were charged with the crime. It's even pretty obvious that she's not a 'perfect victim'.

Yeah, I'm guessing if she'd backed down on where it happened they wouldn't have been able to pursue it.

I don't have a premise, just a lot of questions. And a lot of suspicion of anyone expounding to clearly know the whole truth because they follow the news.

What makes it pure fantasy?

Yeah, I guess my problem is so many of the inconsistencies were caused by the prosecution and detective teams, and she's being held accountable for them as well. She didn't go in and say "this dude, with this name, raped me." She went in and said she was raped.

Yeah, that's why I'm asking you. Please read this as an honest question and not as a lawyer 'gotcha' question. What evidence in particular made it clear that she was lying?

I'm curious about a lot of the inconsistencies that aren't being addressed. Things were all one way then and they're all the opposite way now, and people aren't looking for what's underneath.

Isn't that stripper maybe afraid for her job? Admitting a colleague got raped by some clients would probably get you fired.

That all seems consistent with behavior of someone who was raped while drugged.