Yeah, on a different thread I acquiesced this point. It's totally Mexico on the official map, which was released recently. But yeah, book interpretations are all over the place, which is kinda cool.

Well, I mean the entire world has changed, including the sea levels. So, I could see Mexico becoming fishing specialists.

Yeah, I was basing that off of an old fan made Panem map. Since it was fishing...they thought Boston (which I bought), but the new more official map does look like it's mostly in Mexico, which is interesting and does kinda change things for me. Now I do kinda see him as mixed.

...The themes aren't actually similar. While they're based on the same source material (the minotaur myth), the overall set up, conclusion, and thematic elements are totally different.

huh, actually there seems to be a lot of contention about the location of the districts. The closest thing to canon places district 4 in Mexico.

Well, it's bronze in the book. Which to me, once again, meant a kind of a red-gold. but bronze could be blonde or brown as well. Or, like most people's, a mixture.

Oh, I don't care who they cast.

....did you just say that someone was hot enough to be forced into prostitution?

I always saw a scotch-Irish boy when I read Finnick.

I never understood the "Jesse Williams looks like Finnick" argument.

...I...what levers are you pulling?

Came here to say this.

fuckers.

For some reason this has been a huge problem since I moved to New York. Seriously, no therapist wants to take insurance. So strange to me.

Well, I think clearly the greater atrocity here is that child's grammar. The fuck are they teaching.

Then you're less a part of a sea of change, and more a nutcase. I'm not even sure what to tell you. Your primary dating criteria is 'thin and youthful' and 'grateful' and you refer to your significant other as an 'AZN' and a 'girl' (which would only be appropriate if she was under 18, I really hope she is older than…

You named yourself dude bro. We know you're a troll, dude. Be more clever next time.

My anecdote directly contradicts this data, and thus disproves it's entire existence, because my experience is the only thing that matters.

While it's a valid point that firing people over internet backlash is kinda skeezy...like I mentioned. People get fired over lesser offenses all the time.

The halloween costume reflects all of those. It's a picture of a costume in poor taste (immature), taken and posted online at her work (unprofessional), and sent to friends (PR disaster).