If part of your jurisdiction is an area that requires specialized vehicles to access (off road, ATV, whatever), then you should have those vehicles in your fleet, no?

I mean, yeah. It’s tomatoface. It’s all trolling channel, all the trolling time. This is his sad little hobby.

A prohibition would work in the sense that if it could be implemented, it would definitely reduce gun violence across the board going by other data points and what little research there is on the subject.

I doubt any of them ever had any integrity to give up.

the same picnic, in fact, where the official Team Mitch Twitter account tweeted out an equally charming photoof opponent Amy McGrath’s name on a gravestone.

Hi tomato.

The problem is that you specifically blame Trump for every mass shooting.

Sure, missing that the file was still available could happen to anyone. But choosing not to take the video down when her mistake was pointed out was a choice, not an oversight.  Her reasoning that it might spur ESA to bring it down is sound, but so is the reasoning that it may have caused the leaked information to…

AR-15s like those mentioned in the article are fairly popular among hunters, and not just for wild hogs. (Honestly, I’d want a larger caliber gun for hogs - they are mean, hard to kill, and will come after you from what I understand.) It allows for easier follow up shots than a bolt action, has less recoil, and…

Both also works, but the article is only talking about one specific rifle. If we have to choose, I’d prefer the one that prevents the most unnecessary death.

If we want to reduce “normal” (as in, not a mass shooting) gun murders, reducing or eliminating access to handguns would probably do a lot more good.

I’m not “supporting ICE”, you unfettered simpleton. The world doesn’t work in only black and white.

And do you have a source for the “people on the ground”, or just a faebook meme from someone who wasn’t there? Because you certainly haven’t posted it. It seems you’re just letting your confirmation bias determine who you believe, not “people”.

In an imaginary massacre, are only imaginary friends and girlfriends from Canada killed?

It’s a way to deliberately torpedo any gun legislation and blame Democrats. By poison pilling any gun bill, they guarantee Democrats won’t vote for them. Then they can say “see, Democrats don’t really care about gun control!” while pulling out the old standby of “Democrats are for open borders!” because they voted…

This appears to be is false. Maybe don’t spread unconfirmed rumors as fact?

Sure, views can change. But they can also not change, even in 40 years.

No, that’s not a strawman. That is what you’ve been saying - that they shouldn’t talk about these things without a plan to implement them, but that a plan to implement them is outside their abilities as President.  In other words, a catch-22 that says “don’t talk about this”.

Exactly, none of what they are promising can they deliver even if they win.

You are correct, I did misread your comment. However, the unsupported part still stands. You claimed that Mexico has already offered “them” work visas and help finding work. So, [citation needed]. Show that Mexico has offered every asylum seeker a work visa and help finding work, which is the argument you presented.…