Korematsu isn’t legitimized here because this ruling has nothing to do with legal residents. That is a huge difference that you’re just sort of glossing over. Restricting travel into the country of foreign nationals is a much more limited action, and doesn’t violate all kinds of basic rights like Korematsu did. You…

Forcible relocation and internment of US citizens and legal residents is very different than barring entry of foreign nationals from a specific country. 

Technically yes, but that’s why he argues that it shouldn’t be used as a basis for a decision (the dissenting argument is based on Korematsu). It was a bad ruling as acknowledged by everybody. So we really shouldn’t be using it to decide anything.  

Since the ruling only upholds the “lite” travel ban, it still allows for a waiver process. It also removes any group exemptions, like that originally given to Syrian Christians.

This is why arguing anything based on Korematsu is problematic. It is universal acknowledged to be a bad ruling. So in referencing it (in legal terms) it’s hard to see exactly what argument is being made. 

The huge difference in this and Korematsu is that it pertains to foreign nationals, not legal residents and US citizens. Plus arguing anything on the basis of Korematsu is confusing because it’s never been officially overturned, but everyone acknowledges it was wrong.

Roberts goes into detail about why it differs from Korematsu:

It only upholds the “lite” travel ban, meaning only specific countries can be banned (no Syrian Christian exemptions) and there has to be a waiver process. The SCOTUS rarely makes rulings trying to judge intentions. Their job is to decide if this is legal under executive authority. Because it only pertains to foreign…

Just curious, but why cite KTBS? They’re a local ABC affiliate out of Shreveport, LA. Nowhere close to Denver.

Jeff Bezos’s net worth should have no bearing on these negotiations. If the Wapo editors are getting unfair compensation, then they should argue on that merit. But his personal wealth is not a valid reason to ask for compensation.

Anarchism is not a realistic objective.

My guess is that he thinks “anarchism” is the same thing as radical leftism. Of course any adult who considers themselves an anarchist has, at best, a very meagre and limited understanding of political philosophy.

He assaulted and injured a sitting US Senator. Assaulting any US government office-holder or their family is a federal crime. I think it’s basically to discourage people from “roughing up” members of congress as a form of blackmail.

Yes you are correct. I forgot all about the Polish intelligence work. If I recall correctly, the Polish group were the first to figure out how it functioned, but by the time the war started the Germans had already switched to an altered rotor design. The new rotors had to be captured intact before the code could be…

If you do have a stockpile of mustard gas, the FBI might like to have a word with you.

A lot of very secretive equipment in WWII was known to exist by the enemy, but they didn’t know enough about it to counter it.

“But that’s not part of my birth plan!”

As a resident of Caddo Parish, I can say with certainty that this guy is a con man. He may have actually intended to produce a vehicle at some point, but his business plan for the past 3-4 years has been to con investors out of cash.

Unfortunately you have a decent point there. But rarely do they rise to the level of influencing foreign policy discussions.

Death threats to players over a warm-up soccer match is insane. The Palestinians will have to acknowledge the existence of an Israeli state sooner or later.