ragingbulldog
Raging Bulldog
ragingbulldog

I stand corrected. You’re right about that. The overwhelming majority of Bernie supports I have talked to did say I told you so. I’m not a Bernie fan and I don’t necessarily think that he is an “honest socialist”, but his supporters did see what was going on and many didn’t support Hillary even after he told them to

You know, it’s possible that “we just elected a fascist and there is strong evidence that a brutal dictator had a hand in that” AND the information that said brutal dictator exposed to make that happen proved beyond any doubt that the DNC is completely corrupt, the media is totally in the bag for the democrats, and

Based on the comments, we need to define “hack the election”.

Please remember this one fact. No one at the DNC nor close Hillary ties ever claimed those hacked emails were faked.

The CIA is giving you their best and honest assessment.

It’s amazing how far this is playing out. It is being claimed, in a secret report from anonymous sources, that Russia’s hack of Democrat’s emails is what this is about. Not that Russia directly hacked the voting machines or counters, but an indirect affecting of the vote by releasing information — and actual

If you think you’re going to have commenters on this site agree with a realistic, non-left leaning fact, you’re gonna have a bad time.

Me preparing for the comments:

Well, I thought we were talking about these problems at scale. Clearly for every person like you, there were enough people who did the opposite in swing states for it to make a difference. But the idea that Putin could somehow engineer the perfect storm that led to the confluence of circumstances is conspiratorial

Here’s what I find amazing. Regardless of who was responsible for the acquisition of the information leaked from the DNC and John Podesta’s personal email, no one in the media or on the left (not that there is a difference) care about the content. They only care that they lost an election. For instance, the NY Times

From U.S. District Judge Paul Diamond on the rejected PA recount, “Most importantly, there is no credible evidence that any ‘hack’ occurred, and compelling evidence that Pennsylvania’s voting system was not in any way compromised,”

Oh, you must mean how WIKILEAKS exposed the Democrats’ rigging — yes, RIGGING — of the election. #FIFY :-)

It’s easy to pile on the driver for not looking where they’re going, but on the other hand, that’s a really shitty place for a loading dock, and I could see how someone might miss it if they were staring up at the building walls.

That... is a terrible place for a loading dock, especially without any signage.

Regardless of if they were cooperative or not it’s not like an uncooperative congress is out of the norm. Every president deals with that. It’s a collective effort whether it’s everyone pulling in the same direction or many people pulling many ways. You don’t get there by any one person’s or one group’s decision(s).

“Topping” a trillion is wrong. The trillion is projected cost over the 50-year lifetime of the program. Fifty years of fuel. Fifty years of maintence. Fifty years of training. The trillion dollars has the truth of: A) Not having been paid out yet; B) Being much less money involved than the prospect of keeping

this program has managed to top $1T

I agree that cost-savings on the F-35 may be little beyond us...but I read the tweet more as using the F-35 as an example of out of control costs- not wrong- and the promise to cut spending as more of an across-the-board, more than just the F-35 promise. I believe the WashPo just did an article about some private

My fantasy is that Trump will get rid of the cost plus contracting system. That’s the root of the problem. I can only assume that with his amazing and terrific experience in business Trump would have laughed at any contractor asking him to sign a cost plus contract.