See this? This is how you do popular science journalism (or blogging or whatever). Especially the headline: “New study suggests...” not proves, or even shows, but suggests. Then “Alzheimer’s is associated with...” not causes (or is caused by), but associated with. No hyperbole, no overblown claims or clickbait-y…

As an engineer this pleases me. Using hard data to back up your design and analysis gives me a bit of a woody.

That’s cute...

He is that good, and I think Rossi has a point.

Can you point to where anyone has said he should not have received a ticket?

Maybe drivers shouldn’t be allowed on the road if they’re going to do unsafe things to motorcyclists. Like merge into motorcyclists or tailgate them.

Do you know why a bike might want to be first at the green light??

You are taking the stance that the law is always right. It isn’t. Safe and illegal are not mutually exclusive.

False equivalence was everywhere in those comments. My takes: The pass was safe, riding without a license is dumb, riding without gear is dumb, the car driver attempted to murder two people without remorse.

I’d go find a gif that shows someone missing the point, but I’ve got better things to do.

Can you imagine how much more congestion there would be, if all those riders drove cars instead? Great example both why splitting should be legal and how motorcycles are key to help with traffic.

Hi.

Here’s my take: Who cares?

Feel the Heat!

I guess you can say things got whellie out of hand.

Ankhamen right in then.