In this case, it would when volume drops significantly and it will because nobody is going to pay an extra 25%. So even if the car is manufactured domestically in South Carolina or Alabama, it apparently doesn’t matter in this new round of tariff talks.

I think your comment “I’m happy it exists” repeats the same sentiment espoused by your compatriot Kristen, and raises questions about the veracity of what you really feel as a car reviewer.

Kristen: “I’m not the hugest fan of roadsters myself, but I’m thrilled that BMW didn’t kill off the Z line. We need more sporty roadsters...”

LOL designs are coming back full circle

It’s called a credit union. You’re right, credit unions are the best, way better than banks. Why aren’t you a member?

3rd Gear BMW’s R&D: they better spend some money on R&D! That i3 sucked so bad it’s a joke. Amazing carbon fiber application, but the EV technology and shoebox design? Ugh, can’t give away these overpriced things.

As a counterpoint so that BMW doesn’t think we hate all their designs, they nailed it with the i8 from day one:

Better yet, the M240i convertible automatic 0-60 is 4.5 seconds, and 4.7 seconds with 6-speed manual. I bet that it rides equally well, plus “usable” rear seats and a larger trunk. And cheaper. And better looking (less gratuitous creases).

It’s so obviously a touring car with sporty pretensions, and using extra angles to prove that it’s not just for hairdressers anymore.

Sadly, they have been studying Audi’s interiors for years, and can’t come up with something at least as good? MB interiors have raised their game and are now the equal of Audi. What’s up BMW?

Thanks for your valiant effort, but I’m just not feeling it with this car. Interior, exterior, etc., does not resonate with me in the same way the original Z3 did. I prefer the Audi TT interior as a more “comfortable” place to be. I’m sure they’ll sell a few to real estate agents, but for $60,000, I’m still going with…

Not arguing that GM is making the “right” decision, but rather, the costly impact of their decision can be distributed over the course of years and a number of individuals - so the CEO’s cost cutting measure makes him look very good in the near term, while the true cost is not readily apparent until years later, long…

Aside from the cult-like following of Subaru states (Colorado, Vermont, etc.), mainstream consumers are more impressed with the fresh interior/exterior/technology of the latest offerings from Toyota, Honda and Mazda. For the sunshine states and mainstream commuters, an overbuilt AWD system is less of a selling point…

The Accord still offers a manual transmission with its most powerful engine option. Can’t help but admire Honda.

That’s why Toyota is making Billions in profit: the Meh lifestyle constitute 90% of the buying public. Ever go to a youth soccer game or swim meet? That’s Toyota’s core demographic of buyers. 

Shared global platform is the “thing”. Unfortunately, developing an entirely new ladder on frame platform that cannot be shared by mainstream models is a non-starter at this point.

Don’t forget the Tacoma and Highlander - these are pretty big sellers. And of course Toyota’s “flagship” luxury vehicle, the Land Cruiser.

You’re confusing the battery nerd with a battery geek.

Hasn’t stopped the blogger from demanding more manuals (despite 1% take rate), more wagons (despite consumer demand for SUVs) and more interesting colors (stick shift wagon in glitter purple - exactly what Carmax wants to see on its lot).

You understand the article is implying that the Supra is getting the axed before even hitting the sales floor?