Brilliant idea, let’s just hope people find out about it in time!

There is no issue of prior restraint here.

It’s public property, and “time, place, and manner” restrictions are the opposite of the content-based restrictions that you suggest apply to her. It would only be a “time, place, and manner” restriction if the University refused to allow people to deliver lectures, which plainly it does not.

Oh shit you just reminded me that it came boxed with a paperback almanac . . . it had color pages with the flags of every country!

She taught us all that there’s no reason a WOC couldn’t steal the Grand Canyon.

So everything is terrible and stuff obviously, but, uh, that is a really good look.

As a public university? No, they don’t really have that right.

Her brownie recipe is my favorite.

what

I have never understood the appeal of Leo. Whereas, Orlando is probably a tremendous douchebag but man what I wouldn’t give to get his cock in my mouth.

welp;

Yeah, lol, anyone who doesn’t want bombs dropped on foreigners must be a bot, right?

Yup.

It’s certainly a fair summary of what you have said. Do you want to make up more pretend international laws in order to justify your horrible opinion?

It’s so hard for the poor airlines. :-(

So, like, when it’s just a regular overbooking, will they continue to invoke state violence against their customers?

The Geneva Convention doesn’t have anything to do with “calling [things] out”.

Uh, and I am embarrassed for you that I have to explain this, the difference is that we are doing one of those things and we aren’t doing the other. Which means we don’t actually have the ability to control the other.

Lol, remember when you posted this? “I can play this game. Do you think that assad should be able to gas his people with no international repercussions?”

Seriously, how old are you?