Yeah, bro, u mad.

The scope of the untruth here is pretty small — crosshairs pointed at a congressional district, rather than crosshairs pointed at a person — and given that Sarah Palin is a public figure, she would have to demonstrate that that untruth was the result of “actual malice”, i.e. that the NYT knew it was false or acted…

Es aside, as in aside from the E in “ag(e)ist” (because what was funny about that wasn’t your choice of spelling variant).

Remember “Igloo Australia”? Good times.

Es aside, your goofy little temper tantrum was anything but “calm and collected”.

Yeah, no, you didn’t. What you posted doesn’t come close to amounting to a legitimate claim for defamation.

We as a country are so much better than this.

We don’t believe in just giving homeless people homes. That just results in the idea that people have a right to have homes or something.

Explain your theory as to how she has a “good case” here.

Wait help me out here, who’s “Williams”?

Look, don’t ruin people’s excuses to get strangers to pee on them.

Calm down there.

I wonder if he really sounds this weird when he talks, or if it’s partially due to how he was transcribed.

Clearly you are pretty sensitive about these things; it would be wise for you to avoid discussions about North Korea, because they are likely to involve mentions of grotesque acts of state violence. It’s understandable that you find that upsetting.

So your standard for saying something is that it not be “outside the realm of reality”.

I don’t think her boobs are real.

Why is his head so big though.

If you can’t remember last week, I suppose it’s for the best that you returned that pizza.

Seems plausible.

The fact that he feels inclined to publicly gloat about getting away with it really underscores the sociopathic impulses underlying what he did.