Stop trying to make “vulva” happen.

At my new restaurant concept, you even get to wash your own dishes afterwards.

IKEA. Oh, okay. That makes sense.

This guy certainly couldn’t ever be rehabilitated, but the problem is all the other folks that these laws end up being applied to.

Cool, I also have an above average income.

That’s exactly the sort of situation that causes a problem with sexual offender registries and the like, though, because we should have a way of dealing with that kind of gross behavior that is not the same as what we do with someone who molests a five-year-old. If we treat those crimes the same way, then not only do…

What? If you’re a sex offender, you’ve already committed a crime. Not at ALL the same thing as equating all Muslims to terrorists.

a very cohesive and homogenous culture

The existing treatment programs I’ve read about concentrate on teaching them to contain their urges rather than offending, not on any notion that they can be completely “fixed”.

There are certain people who will simply never respond to counselling and behavior modification.

Slaughtering them ethically is nice, but it also takes cultivation of grain to feed them (purely pastured animals just can’t be grown at the same density, meaning we wouldn’t be able to support the existing human population that way). So eating animals doesn’t reduce the ecological burden caused by growing plants — in…

Huh, I’ve been wishing I could spend more of my life pooping.

Yeah, Method is my go-to, it’s hard to find soap that is not antibacterial and doesn’t contain moisturizers (I tend to use hand soap to clean my glasses). I guess it might be a little easier now, though!

I am just speculating, but my guess is that yes, it would be prohibitively difficult. All of that data is spread out in a million separate little systems, each one particular to whatever political jurisdiction it belongs to and not designed to be compatible with each other. Think of how hard it was to make the…

Ha okay. “Your direct quotes of me are delusions.”

And yet you still can’t actually respond to any of the specifics.

Actually, what I did was I directly quoted you saying things that are entirely factually false, and you have been totally unable to respond except by saying over and over that you were right and I “misread” you.

The sad part is the new thing you later claimed you had meant is not only clearly not what you first said, but it’s also stupid and makes no sense! It’s not like you’re going to fool me into thinking you had said something different than what you said anyway, but the best you were able to do was to claim you’d said a d…

Okay. You still said what you said, and it was still stupid and totally factually wrong.

Okay. Whatever. I quoted you saying things you’re trying to claim you didn’t, so I’ll just take that as you just being too embarrassed to admit you’re wrong.