Not everyone goes to college, has a professional life, or defines themselves by their stupid job. People are more complex than this and trying to create models of social behavior based on this criteria is ridiculous and classist.

The maturity level of the people who comment about age differences being “creepy” won’t allow them to process your story. In their heads, everyone is exactly the same and how people look at the physical aspect of relationships between adults is more important than how two adults engage/relate with each other.

Being grey is just a statement of neutrality or something.

That is not a neutral headline.

I was thinking the same thing about Virilio and Camera Lucida having photographs.

There are predatory people of any age. You can’t “deal with the real world right” by using broad strokes that don’t really define any exclusive behavior. I don’t know if you’re suffering from delusions about what love is or why people get into relationships. It’s usually selfish, superficial, and dysfunctional. This…

Power imbalance? What about economic class and race? You are making an incredibly myopic and naive argument that opens a whole load of turds.

Don’t these same dynamics also exist in close/same age relationships? You are all drawing some awfully strange conclusions that don’t really match the reality of how dysfunctional partnering tends to be at any level.

A 20 year age gap is never your business to decide if it’s okay or not if it’s a relationship between two consenting adults.

Not even the consideration of North America?

You don’t get to comment on ageism and then end your statement with “gross.”

Jon didn’t take a canoe to Dragonstone.

So rent and house payments are not serious?

Here’s a life hack: learn how to use quotation marks properly and don’t use the expression “is a thing.”

This review is so dishonest and petty. If you think this is edgy, I can’t imagine how safe and blasé your cultural knowledge might be. She sings well enough and there isn’t anything that makes this stand apart— positively or negatively— from your average pop song.

“I’ve had lovers assume they aren’t good because only heavy breathing and slight noises aren’t enough”

The differences are pretty minute when you compare things like Good Charolette. It’s the introduction of octave chord parts that are supposed to give the bubble gum songs a little bit of intensity or grit. The style as a whole is a weird marketing mash and rebranding of pop culture symbols of teen angst. Some people…

This is so weird. Like, exaggerated fake moaning is bad enough when it comes to displays of pleasure but drooling? Come on. Nothing feels that good that either responses are warranted. 

It isn’t emo. It doesn’t share any of the influences, history, content, etc. The term was co-opted by the media and squares.

What’s going on with drooling and spitting? Ew?