I think it’s silly when people try to define nerd and geek as if it’s something that everyone agrees on, and then tries to tell everyone else that they need to obey this particular definition. They’re both slang, and neither has a real definition, no matter how many Wikihow articles people link to try to make it a…
Pyrax
pyrax
Turning being nerdy into a points system makes you a flaming asshole.
He’s not a Sterling.
That’s a fair point. However, I would argue that while patrons are always there while employees are there, the owners and managers are allowed free rein of the bar when no one is there to watch what they’re doing. If you don’t trust the owner and managers not to use that mirror, then you probably shouldn’t trust them…
Not that I’m a peeping Tom, but it would be easy for someone to wedge the door shut. If I saw a closed door in a bathroom and tried to open it but failed, I would assume it’s full of bathroom supplies and just locked for non-employees. I wouldn’t assume two-way mirror and man peeping inside.
His logic, flimsy as it is, is that they put a witch in there for Halloween and then light up the inside while a woman/girl (since they have kids nights there as well) is going to bathroom or about to go. The way those mirrors work, the light changes would allow you to see through it and get scared because the mirror…
The screed is the owner speaking, not the author. Seems like you need a bit more reading comprehension before you start lecturing.
Please show your work. You’ve interviewed every patron and employee of this bar for the last 14 years, yes? Because that’s the only way you can say with any sort of surety that it’s never been used in that way.
It works in two ways. One way it works is as a mirror. The other way it works is as a window.
Oh, you’re just a garden-variety misogynist. Got it, thanks! You can continue on your merry way thinking all those hysterical feminists must be raving and you’re the only one that sees the true light. Maybe one day you’ll wake up to realize that when everyone is telling you how wrong you are, maybe it’s not everyone…
Among the 100+ reviews the bar has, tucked into one 3 star review from July 2014:
No, what you’re saying is that if the mother and father in this situation disagree, the mother should do what the father thinks or else she’s a bitch. This isn’t a situation of compromising, it’s either go or don’t go, and you’re saying that she shouldn’t do it just because the father didn’t want her to - in this case…
When did you see her?
When women are called bitches, it’s meant as overly-aggressive, doing what she wants, not submissive. When men are called bitches, it’s meant as overly-submissive, doing what everyone else wants, not aggressive.
So in your ideal world, anything that one parent disagrees with, the other parent must concede not to do or else she’s “a bitch”? (nice gendered insult there)
“John Doe is not guilty of killing the truck driver but he is also responsible.” That also sounds like a contradiction, but here we are.
Logical -> one can be found responsible and not guilty, or not responsible and not guilty.
Your logical path to this conclusion makes no sense. Because the evidence standard is less, therefore they found him innocent? Those things don’t follow. The reason it’s “guilty” and “not guilty” isn’t because of the amount of evidence, so lowering the standard doesn’t logically change the verdicts.
Whatever you have to tell yourself to cover up the hypocrisy.
Yours. The one where called Pornstars a “crazy white person” for using the term culinary desert. Clearly, if you don’t understand hyperbole when it comes to peoples’ tastes, you are also calling the author of the article crazy for saying that your life is on the wrong path because you ordered tuna at a Subway.