We should really hire people to just review laws all day and make sure they're technologically up-to-date, instead of waiting until someone bumps against the outer barrier of a 45-year-old law and gets screwed over because of it.

monster cook compilation

No, it makes you the worst at DATING. You're a winner of dating sites! Too bad that being good at dating sites is useless unless you can also date.

Why? Why should we keep it simple when it comes to food but not medicine, dental care, hygiene, etc.? This is what bothers me - the "it just can't be healthy" with no proof whatsoever to back it up, just an icky feeling when you hear the word 'chemical'.

I heard that on one of those daytime doctor shows. They framed it as "the real proof diet soda is bad for you!" and I rolled my eyes because all it said to me is that as long as I actually watch my calories I'll be fine.

I can never buy the "that's what we evolved to do so we should do it" argument, because we do so many things today that we didn't evolve to do. Our teeth evolved to fall out early because we didn't have technology to keep them in. Our nails evolved to stay long because we didn't have nail clippers. Our hair evolved to…

You're right. The same skills that manipulative popular people use in high school to get what they want will rocket them to the top in real life - the ability to put down those that can't/won't stand up for themselves without invoking the wrath of authority figures, the ability to look like the frontrunner in…

I bet she was one of those kids that tattled to Mom every time things didn't go her way.

The second letter confuses me so much. "I've been reading about feminism, and now I'm REALLY MAD at the women in my life that haven't been acting the way I think is appropriate!"

It's a hard situation - she's obviously trying to get girls into sports who think they're too "girly" for sports. But in doing so, her argument reinforces that they should be worried about looking feminine while increasing their athletic abilities, which is an unfair burden on women. But it's a burden that already…

It's time for the regular "WHY DOES X-2 EXIST" slobbering fanboys to emerge. I see they've already made their appearance.

Because the fanbase bitches at them for not being innovative enough.

The way our society is set up nowadays isn't very conducive to people learning to be "better consumers", especially considering basically every business will not have your best interests in mind. We don't live in a world where companies try to make what's best for the fans and the fans try to do what's best for the…

I've been going back and reading classic books and have been shocked by how many are just one-offs. Nowadays if your book isn't at least a trilogy it's not selling at all.

So you're saying you wish you had been dating the "vile" men that consider women over 30 to be expired? They sound like terrible people. Why would you regret not making yourself available to them?

Eschewing knowledge because it doesn't have a direct effect on your everyday life is ignorance. Every school teaches the most basic facts of the Earth orbiting the Sun, so if you actively choose to not learn and forget this information, then you probably aren't intellectually capable of engaging with the world around…

That's like if someone asked you "did you turn on that lamp?" and you saying "No, I just allowed the electricity to reach the lightbulb in such a way that it began to emit light and heat."

As you can see by a lot of the replies to me, it's not really about how you want to label other people, it's how they want to identify - and you can also see that there are drastic differences between the way "gay" and "lesbian" came into being, are used, and even what parts of speech they generally are.

Because some women are fine with lesbian or even prefer lesbian. Those people are just as important as the people that prefer gay, who are just as important as the people that don't care either way.

Wow! You are one cool dude.