Yes, the article is about forcing women to bear all children she becomes pregnant with, while criticizing her for having children, and with a dash of birth control banning for good measure. Get the context yet?
Pyrax
pyrax
Until she goes to get an abortion, then the same people spouting this change their tune to "It's no longer your body, it's the fetus' body too and you have lost all right to control it." Funny how those two are so linked.
Because the less regulations we put on anything, the shittier people become, harming others in the process. No laws only works in a world where everyone is good, honest, and on equal footing to start with - anarchism is the ultimate optimism. (Or the ultimate sociopathy, depending.)
Because we are living in a society where we care about our citizens and use laws to prohibit abuse of those citizens. In an ideal, good-person world, your employer would freely agree to the wage, you would freely agree to the wage, everyone would be happy because you'd get money and your boss would get cheap labor.…
Companies wouldn't need all that "socialist" regulation if they stopped trying to find every loophole to fuck over their employees. Capitalism only worked in the past because stores were mom and pop, family owned; when the owners care about the employees, working is a mutually beneficial endeavor. But now, when owners…
It looks a lot like puppy wants to get into the room beyond the mirror and the other puppy needs to GET OUT OF THE DAMN WAY.
When I first got my 3DS, I was obsessed with that game that came with it, Faceraiders I think it was called? I was also enamored with the idea of playing in public in hopes of Streetpassing because it was all so novel so I would be playing Faceraiders in the student center getting stares from everyone.
When she said "multiple partners", she meant "multiple romantic partners". As in, bringing in multiple women she's already in a romantic relationship with for a threesome, when those two are not in a relationship with each other.
I think it's mostly women on other ones - iirc the fashion week one was mostly women and the only stand-out people I can remember from the Coachella one were women.
I see where you're coming from but I'm not sure I agree.
Your argument is equally applicable to any other class in the world; trade classes can be learned either on the job or by Googling, and humanities classes can be learned through discussing things on the internet.
I go to a top 20 university. I'm taking a class where one of the assignments is to watch Downton Abbey. As an assignment for another, I'm required to watch the Super Bowl this Sunday. And these are far from cutesy pass/fail classes, they're serious treatments of serious subjects.
I'm pretty sure you can just zoom in that far with the scroll wheel, and it's someone playing another champion and facing here. Although there is some weird fan patch that lets you play in true first person mode and it's dizzying.
Considering I specifically pointed out the 73 degrees number, it's very obvious that I am in fact talking about the study that...mentions 73 degrees. They say they adjust for social class in that study though on further assessment (and health, which makes me wonder how they could have done that), so that could be off.
This article is skirting the line that Jez draws whenever anyone expects feminism out of them...
People vastly underestimate all the things that go through our minds subconsciously when we decide what to eat and what we like/dislike. We think of all the TV shows where impossibly beautiful people are always stuffing their faces (Gilmore Girls, for example). We think of the person in the Coke ad that looks like us.…
Things our society doesn't care about:
Could the "keeping the house at 73 degrees" be class-related? I know that my family generally can't afford to run the inefficient heating system in our house (baseboard heating), so we run one space heater and it gets very, very cold. Since poverty and obesity are linked due to food deserts, lack of time and…