I don't think that she actually wore a dress like that, but I guessed it because it was slinky and looked like a mermaid tail. I guess they didn't like the ones that she actually wore enough? Or they wanted to put her in an underwater scene so the others didn't make sense? Who knows?

To be honest, I had to fill in all the ones I knew and then come back for Tiana and Jasmine, because I've never seen Princess & the Frog (although I might watch it tonight after seeing this) and it didn't occur to me to see red as a Jasmine color, haha.

Omg.

I've been waiting my whole life for this.

I thought it was pretty obvious that his lashing out at the beginning of the comic was meant to be expressions of how he felt about himself, scapegoated onto the dog.

No, your personal observations cannot be extrapolated to the world at large. This is what you did; you decided "enough" of the people around you were "giving up" on fashion, so made a sweeping statement that it's no longer "a time where people take a lot of pride in their appearance".

It cracks me up when people try to generalize about an entire group of people off of what can only be their own personal observation and speculation.

As long as she includes what it means that one of the few things he'd changed was "woman" to "girl".

I want that professor as well. Can she come write for Jez?

As a pansexual woman, can't you only define pansexuality? Or if we want to be more specific, you can only define your pansexuality. Certainly not the pansexuality of others, and certainly not another sexuality.

Does Regina's necklace DISAPPEAR in that gif?????

Dismissed because Jesus Christ, calm yourself. All I did was say you had an illogical leap in your argument and disagree with you.

If it was the 70s or 80s and this group existed, you probably would not have heard of it. Saying "I didn't see anything back when the internet wasn't a thing, and I see things on the internet now, so obviously it didn't happen before" is illogical.

I disagree. Both of those have long-term, serious consequences that yelling once does not have.

I think acknowledging it can be harmful to yell/spank/bribe is good. I also think acknowledging that in most cases, it won't seriously damage a child beyond all repair is good as well.

He's a villain, but just not-villainous enough that his villainy is seen as dark and brooding, not evil (think Draco Malfoy). He acts and sounds "refined". He has the pale skin/dark hair aesthetic (as Loki, not as himself) that many people like, and then as himself he's got the redhead niche down as well. As a person,…

Your....your bear hands?

I would argue that using sexuality as an attack on a person is particularly offensive.

It always worked perfectly the few times I tried it. I can't remember if it was more or less effective than shaving, but the hair came off. Then again I'm not picky as far as hair goes so if it wasn't perfect I probably wouldn't have noticed...

I feel like...personally proud. Even though I didn't do shit.