>but I had no problems with 89.

> With a turbocharged engine, isn’t the impact of altitude mostly nullified?

> But they run just fine on 89,

> I think some people over-mask,

That GV60 is giving me modern 08-14 STI hatch vibes. It has a nice profile with lots of body and those wheels are a combo of OZ Rallys married to STI five-double spokes. All it’s really missing is a big spoiler.

> its 28th annual Spring Nationals at the Quality Inn in Montpelier, Ohio

Usually physical skill + competition = sport.

> Buyers at West Point Lincoln in Houston, Texas can lease a 2023 Nautilus for $199/month at 0.9 percent APR for 24 months with $6,452 down

Highway Capacity Software (the software used to simulate traffic) calls them roundabouts. So civil engineers call them roundabouts. Most state DOTs do as well.

Because they are the same thing - a looping one-way junction.

>Are these investments really worth it?

Thank you! there’s an upper limit to the fuel economy an engine that burns fuel can get in one of these. And well, that limit is so low that even a big V8 is efficient enough to max it out.

> Fuel per distance

> Not true.

> I really wish more of an effort was put into refining diesel engines so that their emissions systems are reliable and compliant with current regulations.

> engine for barely any benefit

As someone who went from an American V8 to a European I6 Turbo, I can say that I’m damn happy with my decision. The torque delivery is just superior. There’s no performance reason to stick with a V8 given how far turbo tech has advanced.

>It always shocks me how many people STILL think the ecoboost F150's are more efficient.

Sleeper is a little much. Everyone knew what these things could do. I mean, everyone remembers the GTO as the OG muscle car.

I remember people hated the generic 90s Pontiac look. Akin to how peopel view the Beaver face that modern BMWs have, except also dated.