I guess we shall see but that looked waaaaay to easy. I mean sure, it probably bends under pressure that it was never intended to take. To have it bend that simply and see the aluminum split on the seam is very suspicious.

And half the actual revenue...

But that is known going into the transaction. You still had a decision to make (not a monopoly) followed by the requirement to purchase through the app store.

Isn’t the point where the whole argument falls to pieces when you look at the same app on android and iOS and they sell for the exact same price. I have never come across the same app sold on both where one happened to be 30% cheaper because it wasn’t having a cut taken by Apple.

Agreed on this one. They care far more about how stable you are than how good your company is (especially with older “safer” companies). Remember, analysts are paid to predict the market. If your company did something good but unexpected then you were not predictable and therefore bad.

No way.  You can sell nearly any iPhone at nearly double the trade in value on CL inside of a few days.

Ha, the LA area is the same. Every single person tries to drive the biggest most expensive truck they can get their hands on. We have people commuting in duallys.

This is what I find fascinating. If content is owned property, then the owner has the right to change their own property.  By archiving everything you could post something bad due to an autocorrect and it could then be brought against you with little to no context down the road.  People (and likely society as a whole)…

Love when the solution creates problems.  Archive everything and never let anyone redact stupidity in their past and we end up with a giant mess.

So this raises the question of how history as a whole gets documented. There is purpose in putting something on a website that can be easily removed or rewritten. What expectation should be put on a website to be archived when as a source it is temporary?

Being illegal (especially in CA) doesn’t make it stupid. If you want to build a portion of a building in 2018 but want to expand the building in 5 years it has zero bearing on what needs to happen now.

You miss my point.  They can have a detrimental impact on some projects despite having minimal impact on the surrounding area or (in our case) they can have detrimental impacts on schedule despite already knowing that the area is clear of wildlife (in a completely fenced off active runway).

A portion of the project was granted the a waiver from needing an EA. The argument was that the whole project needed to have the EA done at once, therefore none of the project could proceed.

I never thought about the mirroring vs second display.  The ipad pro is clearly capable of doing this and it would absolutely push me towards replacing a laptop with an ipad.

The whole EA process is really terrible in general (think paying a company to literally walk around a field and document any wildlife, for 6+ months, despite the fact that the final information wont change what you build). To make a large project that expands across the state to perform a full EA based on its…

Yuk, the first gens really didn’t age well.  You can get a gen 2 for less money and likely less headache as well.

It has far more in common with a LR than any minivan...

Its a space issue. Once you jam a massive transmission and longitudinal engine under the vehicle you have to lift it 6" off the ground to not have a massive trans tunnel running through the interior.

Damn this looks good inside and out.  Seems like they are trying to jump right past Caddy and take aim at LR.  I wonder how they compare in real life (i.e. not offroading).

This, its the moving part that’s hard, often not finding/getting the job (assuming you are marketable).