Sounds like a modified flat / consumption tax. The issue with that is that a “flat” tax or consumption tax doesn’t scale well. I.e. - 10% to someone making 25k a year is a heck of a lot more critical than 2.5 million to someone making 25 million.

What a great article.

That’s ethical. Of course there could be no other reason someone was not happy with their experience ( and thusly making intentionally duplicious obfuscation acceptable!) but that they are a horrible person out to shred you. Seems legit.

They’ll realize it in three and a half years.

Infowars - the same site that the headline host for it, Alex Jones, via his attorney argued in an attempt to get custody during his divorce, that his show was basically disingenuous theater (an argument that ultimately failed)? This is where you suggest we get our “credible” science media from.

*they’re x 3.