That’s a valid argument, though I’m not sure I’d sign on to it, but for the sake of continuing pedantry: the fact that because the car is following programming rather than making a choice simply means that Mercedes’s programmers made the choice, and a person who buys the car endorses that choice.

He’s Canadian.

I don’t want to give him any good music to use, but this is perfect:

Is that Jeb! ?

Please explain eco-dentistry. The stuff I saw was just regular dentistry with a eye towards environmentally friendly stuff, like LEED offices and reducing paper waste.

stink.

Is it too late to run Pop?

Not one Milhouse? Come on people.

That’s a shit argument, Hammurabi.

This is the best one: “Our very weak and ineffective leader, Paul Ryan, had a bad conference call where his members went wild at his disloyalty.”

Oh shit, please take me by the pussy and fuck me up against that wall, the heat of your take is just sopping me right up.

I don’t understand those dudes; they’re driving this fancy-pants douchecar, but then they’re wearing like... Constanza clothes. But then they’re not 60 years old.

A car that is also a vape.

While I agree with the large strokes, you’re off-base on some stuff.

Husker Dum.

Wait, what? When?

Their lack of aggression towards Trump isn’t based on the risk that he wins, it’s based on the risk that his supporters don’t turn out and vote for republicans down the ballot.

I mean, Paul Ryan isn’t some reasonable neutral party. Non-support is basically a condemnation, and the political reality is that (as 538 pointed out) down-ballot republicans can’t risk alienating Trump’s core supporters.

Syria is Russia

I think you described Trump’s strategy, such as it is. This was his only conceivable play, and he ran it about as well he could have, given that he’s Donald Trump. Is there anything he could have done that would have brought the establishment republicans back? Maybe if he were a different person.