If you kid can handle seeing Anakin get his legs lopped off, I think they can handle Chris Pine covering his junk.

So, maybe you remember the ending of TMNT, when Casey Jones completely intentionally crushes The Shredder in a garbage truck with a sarcastic “oops”? The overwhelming majority of modern superhero movies certainly don’t include anything that makes them less kid-appropriate than that. Ratings are subjective, norms…

You shouldn’t coddle your kids, either they will notice the innuendo or they won’t, if they notice it it’s pretty much an indication you should be having the conversation. I would be more bothered about the violence, it is actually pretty extreme violence wise and a lot of adult themes on warfare that aren’t suitable…

Back when I was that age, if there were boobs, butts or even an entirely nekkid person on the screen, we went “Hehe! Butts!” and that was about it. I can guarantee that a little moderate nudity and even some sexual innuendo isn’t going to turn your kids into sex fiends....that’s what puberty is for...

Then you’re looking at it from the position that superhero materials are meant mainly for a kids audience in the first place. It hasn’t been that way for a long time.

Yes yes, just never forget that as a parent the world revovles around you and the needs if your kids. Or, the movie will still be around when you feel your kids are old enough to see it.

Look, I understand that waiting to grow up to see films made for older audiences is frustrating for kids and can consequently produce a headache for adults, but that is nothing new. It was true when I was coming up and my folks wouldn’t let me see everything I wanted to see right away. Calling for movies to be aged…

That is why there is a rating system. WW is rated PG-13. There fore, it would not be wise for you to bring an 8 year old to see the movie. Common sense. Directors shouldn’t water down their vision just so your kid can see a movie. I know it’s super hard for modern parents these days, but maybe just maybe, your kid…

This is a waste of resources, and it will muddle how well a movie does. We live in an age where R rated superhero movies exist and thrive, and now we want to make Deadpool appropriate for 5 year olds?

“your kids do know boys have weiners and girls don’t, yeah? “

i uh, would not count chris pine covering his junk as a ‘sexy scene’. it’s a man being naked in a nonsexual context. if anything ww is curious about him anatomically. your kids do know boys have weiners and girls don’t, yeah? then you’re fine.

I’m not trying to question your parenting or judgement, I don’t have kids and the friends I have that do have a wide range of parenting styles, but what exactly are you worried might happen if your kids see Chris Pine with his hands over his business? What are you protecting them from?

> maybe it makes me a hypocrite for being ok with some violence and not ok with sexy scenes.

I’m okay with this if they make dirty versions of clean movies. Get on it, motherfudgers.

Have you seen the movie As Above, So Below? It was actually filmed in the catacombs (in fact, it was the first movie to get permission to do so), and I get the impression that there was very little set dressing for the movie. It’s one of the creepiest movies I’ve ever seen, and I watch a *lot* of horror. It’s not just…

that...that’s not the point of sip’s comment

Wait, what? I read it as he trolled them with facts and got banned for it. Not that he agreed with them at all. Look at other posts, clearly is an anti-Trump person.

“(With my history it’s a part of life now to be constantly angry at all the rapists and child molesters out there)”

This is how our world works now. Haven’t you gotten the “So much for the tolerant left...” comment whilst calling out racist/sexist/homophobic/fascist behavior yet?

He’s an oncologist, he of all people will understand someone ridding themselves of a cancer.