Um, except actually, the majority of people *will* still get out everything if not more. In fact, it’s only been recently that we’ve reached a point where it’s accurate to say that many people won’t get back as much as they’ve paid in. And if the cap had been raised instead of raising the percentage withheld, we’d…

I swear, if you weren’t already married, I think I’d ask you to gay-marry me and take me away to Germany. The whole being straight part could make that awkward, but it might be worth it.

I hate to break this to you, sunshine, but “we” most absolutely DO pay those employees. You talk as though you think that employers are scrimping and saving to hand over their own money - do you really not understand that those employees are paid with a portion of the money that “we” hand over?

Because obviously if there is no longer a need for someone to take the order at McDonald’s, there are no more jobs at McDonald’s or anywhere else.

Why would anyone be offering to help on this message board? It’s not as though the family is hanging around here reading it.

I’m NOT crazy. My mother had me tested.

Well, technically, I suppose you have a point there.

If nothing else, would you please decide whether you think the social safety net is Marxist or Socialist? Technically, it’s neither, but it certainly can’t be both.

I remember at least one case back in the early days of the AIDS epidemic of a dying patient from a medical center (?)Florida(?) was brought to SF and basically dumped on a hospital doorstep. I’m furious about that to this day.

You forgot “Benghazi”.

Well, I already search out small distillers and local breweries, so I suppose it’s no big deal to add artisanal cannabis to the list. Hell, there’s no shortage of people that actually drink PBR and Coors Light of their own free will, so there’s bound to be people with a nostalgic hankering for Mexican brick weed.

Just reading “OG Devil Jamberry Dank” makes me want to smoke it.

Well, it’s not reasonable suspicion in states with legal cannabis, whether medical or recreational. Odor *can* still be used as reasonable suspicion in states where all possession is illegal.

Law enforcement doesn’t need a way to test for impairment, and that’s aside from the fact that a test doesn’t prove impairment in the first place. It only proves a number that’s legally accepted as automatic proof of impairment, whether or not the driver actually is impaired.

Well, not everyone. Some of us are waiting for states like Colorado to set up a refugee program so we can apply for sanctuary. I’m still hoping to someday escape from Brownbackistan...

There’s no need for a cannabis test. DUI can be charged now if the driver is impaired, it simply requires an officer to make the case to the judge. That’s easier now than at any point in history, thanks to dash cams and body cams that make it possible to literally show the judge everything the officer saw.

“That would be my only concern, but really, if you’re being an unsafe driver, for ANYTHING, including not getting enough sleep, they should be able to pull you over and make sure you’re not a danger to others on the road.”

Although it should be noted, Republican senators have a wide range of old white men to choose from. After all, the president pro tempore is elected by the Senate and isn’t necessarily going to be handed to the oldest/longest serving member.

An ex-boyfriend refused to wear a wedding ring at any point during his marriage. His excuse was that he didn’t want “perps” to target his family (he was a cop, but he seriously was not that important). About 5 minutes after his wife filed for divorce, he started wearing a ring, saying that there was no shortage of…

Creates some interesting questions for Adam Ant, doesn’t it?