Marches are fake if they’re organised in advance, and riots if they’re not, the only marches that count are *mumbles into hand*.
Marches are fake if they’re organised in advance, and riots if they’re not, the only marches that count are *mumbles into hand*.
I’m hoping it was Matt Furie.
It made sense in that way, it just didn’t benefit the story (IMO at least) and added a bunch of holes. It seemed to be there just to give an ending twist, I would have prefered just a good creepy story set in the past.
Yeah, this is an M.Night movie, so there’s no reason to assume the twist will actually make sense *side eyes The Village*
You’d think more people (particularly writers) would know that since it’s a fact that’s key to the plot of One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest.
So it’s either the same twist as a movie from 1996 or the same twist as a movie from...err...1920.
You weren’t entirely wrong, at least in that DID as it exists in reality bares very little if any resemblance to a “split personality” as it’s portrayed on screen. It belongs in the same bin as “all autistics are savants” and “years of depression can be cured by one pep talk”.
The only way I can see it working at all is if the twist is that he’s faking it (and wasn’t this the twist in an Edward Norton movie from about 20 years ago?) otherwise hard pass.
Having watched the whole series (it aired in the UK last year) it is good IMO, but it’s also weird in a way that makes it super hard to market or even really explain.
Any (R)’s yet?
I’m going to go ahead and assume Joseph Fiennes just picks out scripts from his brother’s rejects pile.
I completely believe this.
I’d imagine it’d probably be used for dissection, with some parts preserved and the rest incinerated afterwards.
I’m British and literally the only part of that headline I understand is “Burnley striker”.
Not just your gut, a close friend of mine knows a lot of people who work in broadcast news and they’re all on high alert over this right now (being asked to prep for overtime etc.) “heavy cold” is a pretty well worn code for “serious in a way we’re not comfortable being specific about”.
I had wondered if that was the case, since I actually think it’s a brilliant plot point for a movie with a different tone that actually acknowledges how messed up it is. One of the reviews mentions how it treats the eventual part where Lawrence’s character finds out like the “I own the book store that is putting you…
Roosh V, a “neomasculine” man with a poor imitation of a Duck Dynasty beard...
Since he basically want to be king* he’s definitely thinking way more.