Horshack, you were dismissed because you’re annoying as fuck. It was a throwaway comment and you’re trying to write dissertation on why Facebook is so wonderful.

Counterpoint: at least you get something tangible from this. People regularly sign up for Facebook and Twitter, giving them all kinds of personal information about themselves and their friends for free.

All aboard  the ungrey train!

hired the firm with the intention of using data to “discourage or demobilize certain types of people from voting,”

Both a smaller absolute number of voters turned out for Clinton and a smaller share of those voters voted for Clinton.

I’m not white, and I voted for Clinton too because I’m not a moron. But y’all can continue to ignore the the fact that Hillary did worse 2016 than Obama did in 2012 (nevermind 2008) with every demographic group except white women (which she lost anyway).

used a company to figure out how to target black folks to suppress the black vote and other liberal groups.

the focus groups are still ongoing. the campaign doesn’t know her [public] opinion yet

Nope. Not kidding, as far as I’m concerned Clinton just happens to be the best contender for not Trump. And that’s a shitty reason to vote for someone.

I am an Arab woman born of immigrant parents. Nice of a white person to lecture me about this. Some battles need to be fought.

2000 wasn’t swung by Nader. It was swung by the 200,000 Florida Democrats who voted for George W Bush.

I know what Sam’s saying, but as a citizen, it’s a hard pill to swallow to vote for Clinton.

Also, imagine the headache of this (unlikely, but possible) scenario: Joe is married to Cindy and Lisa; Cindy is married to Joe, Bill and Dave; Dave is married to Cindy, Tammy and Michelle...

Just think about social security for a second. Currently, if you were married for 10 years or more and get divorced, you’re eligible for half your spouses SS benefits. Their benefits don’t decrease. That means theoretically, 1 person’s SS could be paying for multiple people, but there’s a limited number of them based…

Obviously there’s no hard rule to go by. But if 50,000 people want to do something that’s going to cost the rest of us billions of dollars to implement, then I’d classify that as overly complicated.

The government is involved in marriage because marriage is a contract and the courts get involved in contracts. Marriage confers certain rights, such as the right to transfer property.

1. I’d say no because there are still only two names on the birth certificate and the husband is only married to each wife. The wives aren’t married to each other.

Not things might get complicated, things WILL get complicated. And yes, that is sound reasoning. We avoid doing lots of things that are overly complicated.

In retaliation, North Carolina boycotts education for the last 200 years.