pragmaticsquirrel
PragmaticSquirrel
pragmaticsquirrel

That baby is really Dick Cheney in disguise.

Thanks for lifting me out of the greys!

Llama llama red pajama does not like this newLuLama.

Nope - but they agreed to have their home used as the front for a show, in exchange for money and/or the glamour of having a home in a tv show.

They agreed to have the show shot at their condo, and have other promotional stuff done there. Basically, they were like "we want to have a cool, Hollywood, famous condo, but not tooooo famous. Like maybe Jay Baruchel famous, not Tom Cruise famous!" Sorry, but they opened that can of worms, and if they didn't quite

This story has literally no one to root for.

And lest anyone claim gender imbalance, here is the Men's Rights pumpkin (squash?) in all its glory.

That actually sounds far more interesting- as in, the alien has combined balls and eyes. Nature mixed up reproduction and waste elimination, why not reproduction and sight!

She was 22 years old, and managed to land an internship with the POTUS.

Yes, but were you ambitious enough to become intern to the POTUS at 22? Yes, she might have been naive. But she was also, clearly, a political animal. And political animals are often very capable of appearing very naive, while being incredibly cynical/ manipulative. Not saying she was for sure - but it's hard to

Well, I'm not sure how to respond to that, but clearly my post came off as victim-blaming which wasn't my intent.

All very true, and yes - Clinton clearly was much more at fault here.

Fair enough - I'll edit that to "she absolutely did not deserve the cyber-abuse that she got."

I mean, I get that she probably didn't deserve the cyber-abuse that she got.

I do now! Thanks, I read that too quickly, including the title

Here's betting the neo-cons block her on principal ("fvck Obummer!") an we have no attorney general at all. Or an "acting" AG, just like we have an "acting" Surgeon General.

Why do you know this much about Taylor Swift?!?!?

Thanks for the clarification!

Thanks, now it makes sense

I mean, I applaud the comeback, but my hopes were higher based on the expectations set in the article.