"How to Appropriate Style Respectfully and Fashionably,"
"How to Appropriate Style Respectfully and Fashionably,"
It's called a Drag Ball...not a Vogue Ball...or it least it was back in ancient times.
Apparently our interests intersect, because I bout died when I saw that this morning. AND I was at home watching Paris Is Burning AT PRECISELY THAT TIME so clearly Rihanna and I are spiritually connected.
They do until someone flags it! stfu parents has many examples, if you are interested.
DOES FACEBOOK ALLOW THAT
I definitely get to have an opinion about a friend who would post pics on Facebook of her baby crowning in her vagina. But of course, my opinion centers around her poor social media skills, not her birth.
I agree, the child support system is severely flawed. But it's just...that's not even what the article was about.
The way even complete strangers feel justified in speaking to pregnant women as if they backward elementary schoolers is unreal.
"Put on a jacket, you're going to freeze that baby!" Ugh, yes - stop telling people wtf to do!!!
But in order for tubal ligations to be administered to women, doctors and insurance companies have to acknowledge that women have the right to make permanent decisions about their bodies. Most doctors refuse to perfrom tubal ligations on women who don't have children or are under a certain age. Which is fucking…
Except they won't let you do that, either, unless you're of a certain age, already had a hundred kids or your husband gives you written permission. *BARFS*
Nope. It does not start before a baby is born. Don't pretend you speak for everybody.
No, we can't agree it starts before the baby is born.
It's a huge problem. Let's use an SVU type example, stalker bf pushes pregnant gf down the stairs and while she is only minorly injured a miscarriage results. If you say he's guilty of homicide, does the same apply to a woman who trips over a loose carpet on a set of stairs? It's a terrible catch-22 that requires a…
I do not agree personhood starts before a baby is born. There is no "baby" to kill until it's born, it is a fetus, and fetuses don't have rights the same way any other nonviable mass of cells don't have rights. A perfectly objective line would be that a baby is a baby once it's an actual baby, by which I mean the…
I unfortunately read the comments on the NYT article, probably because I like making myself angry. There are so many "it doesn't matter, abortion is murder!" comments, like people probably read one sentence and then started spewing and foaming at the mouth. And one guy whose comment was a paragraph of "men should get…
while no one is going to agree on an exact time legal "personhood" should start, we can agree it starts before the baby is born.
This is the most effed up thing I've read all day. And I just finished that JP Morgan article in Rolling Stone. I'm 13 weeks pregnant and learning quickly that I'm now seen as a uterus with a face attached (a face that's good for things like telling you how my fetus is doing).
I'm three paragraphs into this Times article and already feel sick. These "isolated" cases are the type of slow creep where everyone just ignores it until it's too late. Fuck everything.
LOLOLOLOL@ the irony of calling something a "PERSONHOOD" amendment and then using it to deny the ACTUAL PERSON's rights in order to save a non-person.