portlypeddler
PortlyPeddler
portlypeddler

You don’t even know the half of it. You know Dana Rohrabacher’s middle name? You know, that former representative from California, that super racist, borderline white supremacist, ultra corrupt conservative and one of Putin’s favorite congressmen? Look him up on Wikipedia. Go ahead, I’ll wait.

Wealth tax, college debt forgiveness, M4A, housing, universal childcare, green new deal... I wonder if there are any plans left that Sanders HASN’T copied from Warren. Sanders is like that boy in school who talks a big game about how smart they are, doesn’t do any of the homework, and then hastily copies notes from

THANK YOU!

>None of the candidates are perfect

Hey, you know which candidate is aware of all of these issues and has a detailed plan to deal with them? Elizabeth Warren, that’s who. Read her plan here. To cover the details you mentioned:

Yeah, I never really understood that point. “There MUST be a Lich King!” Must there, though? I mean, let’s say the Lich King Hat has some kind of “must not self-terminate” clause ensorcelled into it or whatever, couldn’t we just get a bunch of dragons together and just burn anything that crawls out of Icecrown to a

If Gloomberg wants to make people believe that democracy is not for sale, this is not how to do that. On the other hand, if the objective was to further erode our trust in our democratic institutions and suppress voter turnout, I couldn’t think of a more effective means to achieve that goal.

It’s insane to me to see all these people here writing Warren off when the race hasn’t even started yet. She’s polling SECOND in Nevada, ahead of Biden, ahead of Buttigieg, ahead of Klobuchar, ahead of everyone except Sanders. It’s exactly like you said, Michael: the votes haven’t happened yet, and those are the ONLY

If you haven’t already, you should check out Warren’s plan to restore the power of labor unions in America. There’s a lot there (go figure that someone who takes notes with different-colored pens during an impeachment hearing would put together hyper-detailed policy proposals), but one detail I think is particularly

>Fervent supporters of Bernie Sanders, who is Warren’s closest ideological counterpart, will likely never switch their allegiance; they’re with him to the end and are uncompromising on the issue of Medicare for All.

Yup. I think either Warren or Sanders would make a fine president, but I personally lean towards Warren for two reasons: one, Sanders tends to view racism as an effect of class struggle while Warren understands that race-based policy is needed to fight race-based discrimination (see her plan for that here), and two,

Hey, you know who’s got a plan to invest in affordable housing for low income families, make homeownership achievable for everyone who has been redlined and priced out of ever buying a home, and to specifically improve housing in minority communities?

>But first, we should at least try to get free.

>There is no objective reason, aside from racism or sheer stupidity, why any reasonable person would ask this question.

True. They’ll miss, maiming the poor thing beyond repair but not quite killing it, forcing them to unload an entire clip into the game to finally put it out of its misery.

If you’ve spent any time with Sanders supporters online, you’ll know that what Clinton has to say about his online crowd is mostly true. As someone who spends a good chunk of time in various and diverse political online spaces, the stereotype of the angry Bernie Bro who is out to tear down other candidates in order to

>I’m not here to take up space, I’m here to create it.

I feel like in a healthy democracy, a story like this should be sufficient to effectively end a candidate’s run. Wonder what’s gonna happen when/if other outlets start picking this up and start to boost the signal.

>which was SNL’s last episode of the year