Brookland’s screen. “Screen”: shortened from “windscreen,” so yes.

Racecars Are Cooler Without A Windshield

Living up to ur username

Runs and drives, which is better than a brand new Alfa.

Terrible advice. Vehicles in the $4,500-range will be just as reliable as $10k-$15k vehicles, so long as you don’t buy above your price range. There’s no need for the 18-year-old kid to sink himself in debt so soon. Hell, I bought a ‘95 Civic for $1k when I was 16, and it lasted me 100,000 kilometres and 5 years, and…

Pretty sure you’ve never heard of an autogyro. It is unpowered. All of the power is provided by the pusher prop on the back.

Or a Taunus I guess

Ford V4 from a Saab?

It’s also worth noting that Renault comes closest to being the individual marque to hit all the categories, but I don’t think they offer a front/rear car, though they do if you get into their larger trucks.

Leave it to Fiat to perfect service lights.

Check is in the mail Alex. Thanks again.

Oh god. The Regata... I had forgotten...

You missed ‘Call me by your Name’

That looks beautiful to my eyes

And, let’s be honest, a bit of an idiot.

Frontal area determines total drag, but Cd is an efficiency score for the shape. The point of the article is that people are bad at judging the efficiency based on the appearance of the shape (because details matter; mirrors, cooling, undercarriage, flow separation, etc. matter). I think most people would look at the…

Go easy on Torch. He was an art history major.

You also suck at aerodynamics because all you did was look at the Cd and totally ignored frontal area. Drag has two components. Cd is one, frontal area is the other.

Obligatory:

That’s pretty much my 500 Abarth. It looks adorable, then it snarls, pops, and goes for your neck.