"him" and "Bible" doesn't even rhyme.
"him" and "Bible" doesn't even rhyme.
Talk about watering down his self-identity as LGBT....
That's a red herring fallacy.
Pretty sure you're the one who will in end up in Hell for your sodomite sins, buddy.
Why do you have to insult ordinary Christians who have nothing to do with Daniel's family?
Those times were brutal, violent and primitive — and that went for all of Earth's human inhabitants at the time. It was this way until not very recently in the history of civilization. I don't see why you have to specifically pinpoint and blame those actions to/on Jews.
Which is exactly my point. Your original post is OT* from the article's content. This can be clearly seen when you notice the fact that you and the article are talking about two different religions. Only one of said religions consider that both faiths worship the same God. So unless you're viewing this subjectively…
Seriously though? "Religious reasons"? Can I go to school with a shirt that says "I Hate Gays" and then cite religious reasons as an excuse?
I still don't see how that's relevant to the Christian religion, considering that most denominations of Christianity don't follow the commandments which Abraham followed.
Are you referring to the Holocaust? Because that'd be the fault of Nazi Germany, and not God.
Is that really the only thing you got from this article?
To be fair, we should reserve criticism until the church actually says the things you mentioned.
Don't you mean "for not having a foreskin"? Also, who would that be?
But where is the limit set? Can I go to a public school with a shirt that says "Gays Will Go To Hell" if I cite "religious reasons"? Because it happens everyday, especially in the South.
That's not how statistics work.
That would be Judaism. The church mentioned in the article is Christian.
There is a stark difference between murder and killing. The correct translation would probably be "Thou shalt not murder", which is unlawful killing. There are instances where killing someone is justifable for various reasons.
You're so fucking edgy.
Weeelll, there is this section where the Constitution says America is a secular country... with public schools being secular and free from all forms of religions. I think you missed that part.
Actually, the bare minimum of decency and common sense would be to tell him that he doesn't have to worry about having to keep his long hair because a faith-based religion told him to. The invisible deity his parents worship probably doesn't exist.