poltergeist44s
poltergeist44s
poltergeist44s

I'll admit, it took me a little while to get into the Bloodrayne games, but once I got comfortable with the controls, they turned out to be a couple of the most stylish and awesome action games of the PS2 generation. I was holding out for a Bloodrayne 3 for so long, too. It's a shame that it'll probably never come to

I definitely understand that. But the point of my argument is that this benefit can be removed at any time. Steam may be a great company now, but changes in leadership have ruined great companies in the past. I wouldn't take their current policies for granted. That's why I support physical media whenever possible.

This is great and all, and I appreciate that companies have safeguards in place for situations like this... but there's absolutely nothing stopping them from making their games unavailable, even if you've already purchased them. All it takes is one legal fiasco, or even just a whiff of profit. Who knows what the

Spent $50 picking up "The Last of Us" and "Beyond: Two Souls" on Friday. I'll be set until after Christmas.

A driver has a chance of noticing the same car tailing him along his entire route, and calling the police if there's suspicious activity. A drone can't do that. The human element isn't a perfect by any means, but it offers slightly more security than a mindless robot.

I totally respect people gaming on whatever platform they choose, but I've never been able to get into PC gaming. Tried it several times over the years, but I just can't bring myself to finish a game on the PC (yet I'll have a blast playing the same game on a console).

Any sort of combat-centric game without boss fights just feels so... underwhelming. There's no drama, no rising stakes; just the same stuff you've been doing for the rest of the level. A good boss battle can be a defining moment, and turn a mediocre game into an amazing experience.

I suppose he's free to write whatever he wants. I just don't read interviews to get the interviewer's opinion of things. Even though I don't completely agree with his follow-up piece (parts yes, as a whole, no), I would have been satisfied with it existing as a stand-alone piece. My main issue is that he tries to make

I get what you're saying, and completely agree with you. There's a severe lack of variety in the way women are depicted in this hobby (and to a lesser extent, men). And I understand that it can be immensely frustrating for a lot of people. That's why I used the term "secondary problem" in my original post, because

I'm all for asking tough, interesting questions, but in this particular article, the interviewer got his answer, and he turned it into his own personal soapbox. Then he followed it up with another article trying to publicly shame the guy.

See, I find responses like this to be an often overlooked secondary problem in the grand scheme of things. If a man particularly enjoys sexy depictions of women, he's a "man-child" and not "well-adapted". I've also seen them accused of being sexist, misogynist, or supporting rape.

Welcome to the future of gaming. :D

No one is saying not to punish the bullies (or at least, I'm not). You can absolutely moderate and ban them, while encouraging the victims to take steps to prevent similar harassment from occurring in the future. You can do both.

Wow, I don't normally get personal, but you sir... are a huge asshole, and don't know what you're talking about. I'd highly advise that everyone disregard everything you post.

"Being yourself" isn't all that it's cracked up to be. Not everyone is a paragon of virtue, or proud of their circumstances or the choices they've made. Some people have to deal with very painful aspects of their lives, and it's much safer to share those burdens with people you've come to develop and deep and trusting

On the contrary. When the troll finally notices that no one is paying attention to his bullshit, he gives up. He doesn't post hurtful messages in a vacuum, reading and re-reading them to himself. He needs an audience, and other peoples' reactions are what bring him amusement. When you take away the attention, he

"Focusing on how someone can avoid being victimized" doesn't necessarily entail shifting 100% of the blame onto the victim. It's entirely possible to admit that the culprit did something horrible, while also admitting that the victim left themselves open to that abuse.

The game isn't even out yet, and we know very little about the story. There's also speculation that Quiet's skin can change colors and patterns, producing a natural camouflage effect, which would explain why she goes into combat severely under-dressed.

I always thought that video games were a superior medium precisely because they aren't limited by time constraints, like movies. If a developer needs more than two hours to tell their story, the option is available to them. The right game can give you more hours of enjoyment for your dollar than many other sources of

Street Fighter IV is still quite popular, and it's far more cost effective to build upon the current engine and gameplay with new characters and tweaks to the existing roster. Each individual generation of Street Fighter (II, Alpha, III and IV) looks and plays different from the others. Street Fighter V would need to