I don’t see that going over as well.

explaining the difference between proof and accusations, abuse and inappropriate touching wouldn’t be useful in this situation.

That’s not even remotely true.

I know the common moviegoer isn’t the smartest but 3 fucking movies featuring the same actors is something everyone would notice.

There’s no proof that he abused anyone

Are you replying to the wrong person or are you still salty about something else?

This...ain’t an air-tight argument. You can get away with some recasting, a role or two, but replacing an entire cast? Nah. People will notice/care, unless recasting is built into the role (e.g. Batman, James Bond, etc.).

No one is going to see the film because of the actors. They all know that. And so does the studio.

So these were cool before the #MeToo movement?

They’ll hire another mediocre white bro.

he’s one of the rare Congresspeople who actually wants to do good for the country

I’d love for him to run. I’d love for him to have to stand there and explain, over and over again, in public, why he thought, well into his 60s, that dehumanizing and abusing women was fun and acceptable.

If one has lived by that sexist sword, I don’t feel bad if one dies by it.

Exactly.

And you gotta love how when a grown man wanted to distance himself from their bro-boy nonsense, they genuinely think (and believe other people will agree with them) that it is because something is wrong with him and not because they are pathetic and embarrassing.

These type of men are literally the most boring people on the planet.

Exactly.

Why is Jez comments just full of old skeevy men nowadays?

If it were nearly anyone but Tom Cruise, I’d be right there with you.

No one gets burnt by Apatow but Apatow.