poetpotter
potterpoet
poetpotter

You realize that Johannssonn was supposed to be playing a trans guy, right?

The Koch Bros want their Randian-princess Pin-up model starring in Reagan-era propaganda this time. That’s why it’s set in the 80s. Let’s be honest, Jenkins.

The defensive men in the comments seem to be trying, somehow, to rationalize this as films starring women just happen to be terrible and men are the only ones honest enough to see that. Clearly, women are at fault again. 

I was bored to distraction watching that film and missed big chunks of it, apparently.

The Italian legal system is totally different than the U.S. legal system - you’re comparing apples and oranges. There was no “double jeopardy.” There was no “retrial.” This is simply a stage in criminal justice which the U.S. doesn’t have but many countries do.

It is possible to be witty, topical and tactful all at the same time. Too bad these guys didn’t get the memo.

But she’s not wearing it at work

seems requiring 100% agreement/compatibility will lead to 100% disappointment.

Will you accept a Wikipedia summary?

No, thank you, HBO.

If the movie doesn’t get made will you guys count that as a victory?

Genuine question - is Boys Don’t Cry now also deemed inappropriate

How is it bullshit?

I could explain how wrong you are about pretty much everything on every level

but it will likely kill this project or reduce it in scope greatly.

Exactly.

You know who does that?

in a winner take all system, a third party candidate is inherently going to split the vote, sabotaging their own platform. 

Or throw it away on a third party and be ruled by the greater of two evils!

That post seems very sarcastic