podkayne16
Podkayne16
podkayne16

Endorse on the pedophilia definition.

Bolding certain text doesn't change the meaning of words.

So excited for this series!

We could be twinsies! I love to bake, even made a four tier wedding cake for my brother and sister-in-law's wedding, but I eat very little of what I make. GS Cookies are pretty much the only commercially sold cookies I eat. I think I lost my sweet tooth. Now I mostly just indulge occasionally.

I would quibble and move cookies up or down a spot, but not far from where they are, solid list.

I think the quality is in part due to it being a luncheon. There is just so much room in that realm for elegant and playful without needing to be explicitly sexual that you don't get at evening events.

This so much. To me it only makes sense that culture would at times seek to amplify some aspects of our biology and downplay others. Culture itself may be an evolutionary response to the fact that humans constantly find themselves in new circumstances.

I've given up on gel because of what it did to my nails, but I totally understand the appeal. I'm a professional woman who can only wear a few colors anyways (must look Professional!) so semi-permanency is a feature, not a flaw for me. You can find a salon anywhere, so it was a great way to kill time on a business

It is just so sad. Like peering into the void, and the void peering back at you.

Me too! Because everyone looks so happy!

Just a little life hack suggestion:

So-called conversion therapy not only seeks to change sexual behavior, but also change sexual orientation. I don't think anyone disputes that it is possible to "counsel" someone into chastity; the dispute is whether you can fundamentally alter orientation.

Other people have said this, but state law is not winning out over federal law in the marijuana arena. The federal government is simply not moving to prosecute in areas where it probably could.

At my old law firm, three of the five female attorneys left within a one year period. We all had individual reasons, but they could all boil down to feeling that there was little opportunity to make partner and have families, despite the fact that our male colleagues' family obligations were celebrated and

I think it arguably does impede interstate travel, as a citizen would be prevented from availing herself of the rights afforded a resident of the state by virtue of her non-residency. In case you are a super nerd like myself, this is an interesting law review article on the topic: http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/v

No, they are separate issues. One deals with a state's police power, the other deals with the federal government arguably attempting to restrict interstate travel and the "privileges and immunities" of residents from another state entering a different state.

As a slogan, sure, that makes sense. As reality? Not so much. Addiction is a bitch that won't be cured by hurting kids even more.

If the social scene in my state capitol town is indicative, I can guarantee it is higher at the staff level, at least. In Congress and every state house in the country.

Or, the exact same decisions I made this weekend, in this particular case.

Heh. But it is probably unconstitutional as a violation of the privileges and immunities clause.