can someone explain to me why this is being phrased as household income if we're talking about individuals? I've always associated the phrase with combined incomes of couples.

The one further from the window. I don't really care about left/right side of the bed, but I dislike sleeping under/near windows (windows at night are creepy. Don't ask me why, it's a subconscious thing).

I can confirm this.

Sure, they are her babies.... like any other normal person's babies .... because my plan for my kids is to raise them and then drown and dry them before selling them to a pharmaceutical company.

Right hand side (when looking from the foot of the bed). This is because I mostly lay on my left side...and I cannot fall asleep with someone breathing in my face. So, I take the right hand side because then I'm facing away from the center of the bed when I fall asleep. Mr. Noodle thinks I'm crazy, but overall he…

I default to the "away from the door" side, but that's probably because I default to the "close to the window" side, and those are usually the same. (My husband seems to have absolutely no awareness of temperature of any kind, but I am always either roasting or freezing my butt off, so this works well for us. Also…

That's what the old dilapidated barn is for!

I've had two exes insist that I sleep on the side farthest from the door. Both said it was so they could protect me from intruders. Neither really had a good response when I asked them if they realized that I regularly climbed over them to go to the bathroom and they never woke up.

I sleep on whichever side is farther away from the window or air conditioner, because my boyfriend can't sleep unless it's really cold. The average summer night finds him lying on top of the sheets with the AC blasting and me buried under the heavy winter blankets.

Actually, there's very little research on intimate partner violence within LGBTQ relationships, but much of the better research on it suggests that rates of violence within same-sex relationships are roughly the same as rates within heterosexual relationships. If lesbians are beating each other up at the same rates…

Agreed. Which is why I am willing to go to your house and eat your dog.

That's not true, Mexico has plenty of dead lines. I'm not sure how he could have missed that much white chalk.

Ugh. I know there's a certain stigma to the whole "men's magazine" concept, and GQ has fallen into that countless times (too many Terry Richardson shoots to keep count...), but doesn't that make it even MORE of a big deal that they'd publish something like this? Especially since it's coming from a male peer! I don't…

Because, for whatever reason, Jezebel tears apart anything GQ ever does despite the fact that it is probably the least sexist of the men's magazines. Clothes, cocktail recipes, travel, current-events journalism and style advice? See GQ. Muscles, chicks and more chicks? See Esquire, Maxim. I don't get it.

How the hell did that never get mentioned over here??? Updates on the most recent youtube cat offering, of course...but not this?

Of course not. NYC is the most important place in the universe according to Jezebel logic.

The original article is about The Best College Towns in America when the students are not there. It's a travel piece about cool college towns to visit when it's not full of college kids. Trying to link GQ's piece to some kind of endorsement for college rape is ridiculous, as is condemning tourism to an entire town…

What a strange critique. There were schools in NYC on the investigation list, too. Should we stop visiting New York?

How dare GQ celebrate these towns. Don't they know that bad stuff happens there? Why can't they celebrate a town where no bad stuff ever happens?

Babies and bathwater are coming to mind right now...