“Doesn’t want: Something too unreliable”

I’m not sure paying a lease payment monthly (plus a down payment), none of which you’ll get back, is a better financial decision than buying an already depreciated car that you will be able to sell for about the same as you paid for it.

Good call - a 996 in particular could even go up in value.

Why not a Wrangler?

Man, these are some boring convertibles. She should get a Boxster or a 996 Cabriolet.  

Kinja won’t let me paste links, but if you go to NPPD’s net metering page they make it seem pretty straightforward: you get paid 8.94 cents per excess kWh you feed into the grid.

My first choice is what NEBcruiser said, bringing a unique concept into production shouldn’t be derided. Following current trends ad nauseum gets us where we are today in a sea of mid-size CUVs and over-sized pick-ups.

Saw one out yesterday. Side profile looks pretty good, but the face and ass are so confusing.

This will serve as a nice palette cleanser after all the horrible cars that will get posted. This would have made Buick look young and hip much better than commercials with millennials saying “that’s a Buick?”

I guess Nice Price. It’s not for me, but it seems like its in good condition. If people are paying far more for 90's economy cars on BaT, I’m sure someone will pay $17k for this. I’d imagine it’s appealing to those who were teens in the 60's, and those people sometimes have disposable income.

My stinkin’ Outback has simulated shift points that you can’t get rid of. What the fuck is the point of a CVT if they are going to make it “shift”

I really don’t understand these constant comments every time a CVT is mentioned. There’s nothing soul crushing about them (if they're built right). You can argue that a manual ADDS to your experience, but acting like a car has nothing to offer with any other transmission is silly. If you aren’t rowing your own, do you…

Bruh, mid 90s civic was the best looking civic. 

Are you telling me the CIVIC, of all cars, is going to be sans a Manual-Transmission option going forward.  Good lawd are we a soft society at present.

EPA - Everyone's a Pedo Always

Your comment is technically correct (the best kind of correct), but in this context it is based on a faulty premise. As far as I know, no automotive manufacturer is using truly water-based paints. What they use are waterborne paints. It is more precisely referred to as a suspension than a solution. The paint is not…

For my pedantic moment of the day, water-based paints are solvent-based. Water is the solvent.

I have the money now, but I value peace and quiet and reliability far more than the fleeting thrill of a throttle stab.

I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time.

Don’t worry all those folks can learn to code and/or become wind and solar installer/maintenance techs!