pmarble
pmarble
pmarble

I feel like very little actually happened this season.

MTV does not know how to make a watchable awards show. They need to consider just stopping.

@BeckySharper: Absolutely. I felt like she was self-sabotaging.

You know what is a perfect word for this? Malpractice.

Bravo, Tim. In this age of endless genuflection to people in power, you speak truth to power.

And now I want a puppy.

@phairenough: Exactly, and I don't feel bad. She's absurdly pretentious and the drawling nonsense that dribbles out of her mouth is seriously annoying.

@phairenough: She laughs when there's a celebrity for her to brown-nose.

To me, the much more interesting question is why she's claiming to want children and her husband is pressing her so hard when it is patently obvious that she has no desire whatsoever to have children at all. The only person who is making that an issue is the show. Whether she's physically capable of having a child

I think Anna Paquin is too short for that dress, and the shoes are just dreadful.

I loved the show from start to finish (except for the stupid tweets, those were bad). Also, what's with the gay obsession in the post?

The ACLU better be on this one in a hot minute.

@captivagrl: I've tried to stay away from references to her health, but I do think given all her problems last season getting pregnant indeed might be difficult.

@accesskathryn: Yeah, I pretty much think that's a bunch of pr BS and that whatever his business was probably tanked and he needed something to do, hence the job for her company. And obviously, she's the company, not him, so while he may add value, he's not the main breadwinner here by a long shot.

I find everyone on this show except Joey to be repugnant. That said, I think the pressure on RZ to have a child when it also is clear that she is the breadwinner in the family an interesting issue and one that is right in Jezebel's wheelhouse. My sense is that Rodger, who has no apparent independent employment, is

@djgnl: I agree — it's so wildly unprofessional. I will say she was a negative and unpleasant presence when she was on the show, but tearing her down, especially when she has no comprable forum in which to defend herself, is just low.

@Myrna_Minkoff: It certainly is an attack, it is not ad hominem. I am quite clear at the outset of my comment that I am offended by the position she is taking, and offering my theories about the possible lack of basis or bias as a motivator for the point she is making is perfectly reasonable. It falls under the

@elliehiggenbottom: I didn't reach any conclusion that I owned my husband and in fact I am fine now. And suggesting two possible reasons for why someone would make the arguments the writer does arguments is not an ad hominem attack, it is a theory.