plzprettypuss
plzprettypuss
plzprettypuss

I think at this point, we really just need to accept certain things about the Oscars as fact.

This one comes via my husband, who this actually happened to:

It went exactly as everyone expected, I think.

"You can't make us do anything."

What? No - listen to that song! "Working in harmony?" "Everything is better when we stick together?"

"He brought her to my son's Bar Mitzvah."

Beheading? Now, I am no expert on how these procedures are done, but I have never, ever heard of any abortion procedure that involved a literal beheading.

Also for the organized secular movement if several women are to be believed. Google "Michael Shermer" and prepare to get depressed.

No, you didn't answer the question. He isn't accused of having mistresses or just large appetites. He's been accused of rape (which I presume is as illegal in France as it is here) and pimping. You haven't addresses the issues at all.

It varies. My mom has had 5 children, and we kept progressively getting bigger (thanks, Dad). Number 4 was 10 lb. 4 oz and 23 inches long. Number 5 was out-pacing that. My mom kind of made up her mind that she wanted a C-section (she has wanted them before but the doctors kept talking her out of it since she kept

Last night, my husband comments about how isn't it weird how usually, the current VP is almost always discussed as a potential candidate to follow the president when he leaves office? (George H.W. Bush, All Gore, etc.). He wondered why Biden's name is not being tossed about for 2016.

This story feels so...incomplete. Are the police running off the assumption that his daughter's trans status fed into the murder (I'd find it tough to believe it didn't, but I don't want to say for sure). The father in the tape says that it was the 4th time he'd called 911. Is that true (I'd presume that those records

I don't think it's puritanical. This guy isn't accused of having a mistress (or a few). He's been accused of rape (and by most accounts he's guilty of it). Now he's accused of paying for sex and not treating the women in a decent way. It's not puritanical to look at that and say, "He's not somebody that should be

The part of it that I find REALLY bad is how it's played out. From what I've read, he never denied actually, you know, taking part in all this sleaze and stuff. He basically just denied that he knew the women were, uh, working while there. He seems to operate under the idea that he is super-duper hyper sexy and that

Gee, how shocking.

Eh. I don't get why people get worked up over nudity. It's the human form. If you're of a religious bent, you're seeing God's creation in all its natural glory. I can't see how such a thing could be construed as "pornographic" or bad. Pornography, in my mind, equates to an image of a sex act. She's by herself and not

If ever a face didn't need any Photoshop, certainly this must be it. The fact that even Cindy Crawford is judged to be less than perfect without it makes me both sad and happy at the same time - sad that even she can't escape it and happy that it's not just us "norms" that are determined to be inadequate.

Just FYI, y'all:

Agreed. I think a huge portion of the debate about GMOs has centered around their safety for consumption purposes (which seems to be pretty safe). However, there are other issues - such as their role in patenting and how Monsanto and other companies use them.

There will always be exceptions. The religious exception used to be narrow because you used to have to show some kind of proof for it. If you were, say, a Christian Scientist, you had to provide documentation that you were an active member of a CS Church and had been for at least a short while so you couldn't just