So you are justifying the genocide of an estimated 100 million humans under socialism between 1917 and 2012 alone. No one can deny the atrocities committed against native Americans in the 1800's, but to equate that with the loss of human life as a direct result of socialism, and then suggest that socialism is the…

Ah yes, the good old “privilege” narrative. Well, you’ve convinced me, we should dive headfirst into socialism as quickly as possible!

“Socialism/communism can work, but only on a small scale”

I’m not confusing anything. To Marx, socialism was the precursor to communism where the government fades away and a pipe-dream utopia magically comes into existence, where all things are held in common by the people. This never really comes to fruition, because when people leading a move to socialism come to power,…

Please, enlighten me as to any economic system that even comes close to the prosperity that capitalism has generated since its conception. There wouldn’t be a semblance of a middle class, or even the possibility of upward mobility that exists today without capitalism.

Socialism isn’t a four letter word among younger generations, because the shitty education system in the US white washes its image. When you tell kids what to think, instead of giving them the tools to think for themselves, it’s not difficult to indoctrinate them. Socialism is responsible for the suffering and deaths…

“But despite RT’s spread of propaganda in the US, American intelligence agencies haven’t exactly made a compelling case that RT swung the election any more than the news outlet that actually got Trump elected: Fox News.”

Nah, does’t really work either.

Meh, I’m sure can come up with a more apropos quote. 

Now you’re just being silly, but that’s to be expected when someone with the maturity of toddler realizes they can’t hold their own in an argument. 

Yes, winning at losing. I won’t shatter your dreams by telling you that is a bad thing.

That’s like four strikes for you at this point. If losing was your intention, then you’re on a winning streak.

First off, I’m not religious...I just don’t like people that use their biases as a justification for making uninformed generalizations.

I understand exactly what you’ve been posting in this forum. Whether what you have been posting here clearly expresses what you claim your arguments to be, or whether you are capable of clearly expressing your argument with words, is another matter entirely.

“Having read and understood religious texts I can see clearly what abominations they are.”

“That both christianity and islam both encourage the worst in people and the only decent religious people are those that only follow small parts of their religion”

“Its rapid expansion, driven by lawn-care companies and reliant on invasive species of grass, sucks up nearly 20 trillion gallons of water a year, 50 to 75% of home water use each summer.”

“I said a number of atheists. The majority of atheists are either persecuted, so they don’t talk about their atheism, or have a life, so don’t talk about a lack unsollicited. The majority of religious people do in fact bring their faith into absolutely everything and use it to forbid other people from doing…

“The problem is with a number of atheists and the majority of religious people is that they can’t do that.”

“It’s not my responsibility to stop people from being assholes.”