Ha, know what’s amusing about that statement...it’s the same unsubstantiated, ill-informed, false narrative that Hillary Clinton preached.

“But, in the mind of Trumpsters, Koreans would be the “good refugees” — still not human like white Christian men”

Aren’t all milkshakes, in the traditional sense of a milkshake, bad for you?

So instead of trying to engage the student making the piece, having an open and civilized discussion as to what the other student’s motivation was, Yasamin shut down any chance at dialogue with the other student by immediately smashing her work. Sounds typical of the atmosphere in US schools these days.

*Sigh,

What you are failing to grasp is the fact that it doesn’t matter if you deem the content of the images on that bus harassment or intimidation, or if I don’t. That is a matter for a court of law to decide, not for you to render judgement based on your concept of what is immoral or not. There are laws against…

“The right thing to do was to stop the immoral harassment and intimidation of an at-risk segment of the population by (completely within the bounds of morality) destroying the private property used to carry it out.”

I said nothing of the sort, I merely pointed out that despite this article trying to spin the outcome of this special election as a good thing for Ossoff, it wasn’t. This was not any sort of victory for Ossoff. He didn’t even manage to pull the 50% needed to win outright against a fractured Rep party. This will go to…

“Or when an employee working at Apple’s Arques office in Sunnyvale on March 14 reported “feeling lightheaded, had difficulty seeing clearly, could not stand. She mentioned feeling stressed.””

You’re openly advocating the destruction of public property based on images you obviously find offensive and are equating with harassment and intimidation. It’s not a giant leap from someone justifying the destruction of public property, to justifying the destruction of private property based on their emotional…

“Destroying private property used to harass and intimidate at-risk segments of the populations is a very good illegal thing”

“Then again, you’re someone who complains that I’m inconsistent and then declares to know the intent of every reader of this blog”

“Something about forests and the visibility of tress comes to mind.” Tell me who’s showing righteous indignation again?

Still failing at being clever, I see.

You never know, she could have been planning her presupposed inauguration since the last time she ran for president back in 2008.

“District’s special election Tuesday has given you something to cheer about.”

You do realize that corporations hedge their bets by donating to both sides in an election, right? If this is news to you, then you’ve been living under a rock.

Your attempt at being clever has fallen far short of the mark. If the author included links to actual news sources backing up their claim that the US is considering invading NK, there wouldn’t be an issue. However the “writer” of this article didn’t do that. They claimed that the US military is considering an…

“For many news enthusiasts, Pyongyang is a trigger word these days. The US military appears to be flirting with the idea of an invasion”

No, it’s not. Opinions aren’t illegal, destruction of property is. I digress, who am I to expect people incapable of thinking rationally, or having open discussion, to behave in a rational manner.