plissken77
Plissken77
plissken77

“But make no mistake that this is a political move, not a decisive military one. Tomahawks are not the ideal weapon to do long-term damage to an airfield runway, like the one that launched the planes implicated in the chemical attack.”

Perhaps you should take that up with Harry Reid.

Ski caps never work....they just get the police called on you.

“If this was a distraction to make it look like the U.S. and Russia are at odds and the presidency is totally not puppeted by Putin, then this was an atrocity and if I worked at Raytheon I would contemplate suicide.”

Matt, since you are so enlightened when it comes to diplomacy and how to handle dictators that gas human beings....how exactly would you have handled this matter?

I’m willing to bet he takes him more seriously than Obama, who couldn’t muster a proper salute if his life depended on it.

“And what better way to terrify the caliphate than by sauntering around in a bulletproof vest”

Which is to be expected. He was tasked with ensuring that Flynn depoliticize the NSC after Obama left office. Flynn was replaced, now there’s no need for Bannon in that position.

If you enter a country without a visa, or express permission, you are there illegally. If you are there illegally and try to stay there permanently without ever applying for a visa/green card/ going through the naturalization process, then you are an illegal immigrant.

“If opt-out options exist, they are hard to locate.”

This is not only sexist, but an asinine claim as well.

If you were going for the most ironic comment of the day, you nailed it.

“But obviously the GOP didn’t care about the Women’s March.”

“If you care about what’s going on in politics, but you’re letting other people do the work, It’s time to pick up the damn phone.”

“1. Don’t read posts that you don’t want to read, they give an indication of what to expect in the headline.”

“Daily Action, for example, sends a text to subscribers every day urging them to call their members of Congress to get shit done. (It’s not affiliated with a candidate or party, but many of the actions aim to resist the Trump agenda.) They recently surveyed their most active users, who turned out to be 86 percent

Should we take this to mean that ESPN will be replacing any employee that voices political opinions outsite the workplace, conservative or progressive?

“M.A.S.K.”

Gizmod and Lifehacker are one in the same. They both have the same agenda and push the same narrative, so yes it is about the site.