plissken77
Plissken77
plissken77

“If that wretched man-shaped thing wins”

If a particular actor’s, or any actor’s, endorsement of a particular candidate affects you who you choose to vote for...then I would suggest you do some serious soul searching and evaluate the way you make decisions.

“You have built a world view where you cannot possibly be wrong. Anyone who contradicts you—even an expert with inside knowledge like myself—is, by definition, “naive.””

Ha, nice one kid. Did I say that I support the Koch brothers? No I didn’t, however I do enjoy calling out double standards. People love to throw temper tantrums over the Koch brother’s, because people like Harry Reid get pissy when some billionaire doesn’t donate exclusively to progressive agendas. And yet you have

“Libertarianism is absolutely positively designed to protect the hierarchies of the status quo.”

“It’s not my claim, Google it. Also bigot does not necessarily equate to racism. It can.”

So two wrongs do make a right then? It’s scary how many people are justifying this by saying “all campaigns are engaging in stuff like this”. It comes across like you are only upset, because she got caught. 

If you’re going to make and allegation like that, you should be the one defending your claim.

“To be frank, however, I’d prefer to imagine that this isn’t a costume at all, and is instead Charles Koch’s version of the Jobs turtleneck or the Zuckerberg hoodie.”

“Federal law that requires military branches to consider bids from commercial companies.”

“When asked during a question and answer session following his speech whether putting the sentient merkin in charge of the country’s nuclear codes might be a bad idea, Thiel demurred.”

He didn’t sue a publication. He funded a lawsuit brought against Gawker by Terry Bollea. Gawker brought about it’s own end by being nothing more than a tabloid cesspool that didn’t care about the effects it’s articles would have on people’s lives.

“#TrumpkinsRstupid!”

You are claiming that Powell is an example of a Republican that used a private email server while serving as Sec. of State, thereby justifying Hillary Clinton’s use of a private server. Clinton has also cited Powell’s use of a private server as a justification, all the while twisting Powell’s words to suggest that he

This seems like a hard concept for you to grasp, but Powell never advised Hillary Clinton to use a private email server for the purpose of disseminating classified information. It simply didn’t happen, no matter how much the media and Hillary want you to believe it.

“Well, no. There are other people who have done exactly this, at exactly this level of government, without being a Clinton or a Democrat, and they are doing fine.”

Powell never advised Clinton to use a private email server for the purpose of disseminating classified information or as a means to cover up her pay-to-play schemes. Clinton knew what she was doing and is trying to throw Powell under the bus as a means to say she was advised by an outside party. It’s disingenuous and

If there was currently an analogous Republican I’d expect them to be hauled before Congress, asked to explain their actions, and be brought up on charges by the DOJ. I’m not sure what you are insinuating, but I don’t favor one side of the isle over the other when it comes to corruption and abuse of power.

“Remind me again- if the two previous Secretaries of State (Colin Powell and Condie Rice) had private Email servers that were okay, why was Hilary’s private email so much worse?”

Maybe he should hire Hillary to defend him, I hear she’s pretty good at getting getting child rapists off the hook.