Hydro and Nuclear are valid, clean power sources. Unfortunately, the current presidential administration is seemingly hell bent on an immediate switch from fossil to zero waste/carbon energy sources, with no comprehension of the magnitude of such a feat. Nuclear will have to be part of any viable plan to move us off…
Plissken77
plissken77
“I just didn’t consider your argument sufficiently intelligent to merit a response to its content.”
The same could be said of Hillary Clinton, however you don’t see the press in the US calling for her to be burned at the stake like they do Trump.
I couldn’t care less about jabs at Trump, he brings them upon himself. I’m more interested in journalistic integrity or lack thereof these days. This is a fluff piece, which seems to be the standard junk churned out by the media in this country when bigger issues surrounding their candidate of choice are readily…
Sounds like I struck a nerve, which is amusing considering I don’t read Breitbart. By all means, continue employing the standard tactic of the Gawker commenters...shutting down any conversation, when you have no valid country point.
“Although the trove of messages doesn’t include any bombshells near the level of Donald Trump’s lewd remarks about women, the hacked emails do include a few surprises.”
I guess Gawker-esque writing is more your speed, seeing that you prefer articles with no substance and click bait headlines. Despite your assertion that this is a climate change policy article or an opinion piece, it isn’t, it’s pure slop.
This isn’t an article about climate change policy. This is a thinly veiled hit piece that the author slopped together, because they are upset Trump wasn’t thrown a “gotcha” question from the progressive media, with which to make a fool of himself.
“I will shed not a single tear because some miner lose their shitty job digging dirty fuel out of the ground, just like I didn’t shed any for the guy that made IBM Selectrics.”
“You could have tricked Trump into saying the other astoundingly dumb things about science we all know he’s capable of.”
“You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.” - Inigo Montoya
Let’s be honest, orange would probably look better on Hillary than it does on trump.
Is that all you’ve got kid?
What I find really amusing is that the Fed is freaking out of the possibility that Russia was responsible for DNC email leaks, and yet they don’t give a crap that the leaked emails revealed massive corruption going on right here at home. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil where the Clinton’s are involved.
If by “journalists” you are referring to former Gawker writers, then you setting the bar pretty low for what qualifies as a journalist.
There is also a thing called Wrongful Termination as well.
Exactly how does karma have anything to do with this?
Again, you make statements without expanding upon them. Why do you think it is “absurd”? Why do you think I’m simply “guessing”? What exactly is your point of view on this matter, because you haven’t offered up a single counter point, you haven’t bother to clearly define where you stand on this issue, and you haven’t…
And what happens if the accuser goes to the school first and whatever committee oversees these matters decides that it’s not worth pursuing disciplinary action? Can you tell me with 100% certainty that this won’t taint any criminal investigation, that law enforcement won’t take the accusation less seriously if the…