plissken77
Plissken77
plissken77

::article is written by the “science editor/ self-styled comedian/ political hack piece dispenser” of Gizmodo::

I feel like my life has just been one big lie.

“Hillary Clinton never once questioned the Obama’s status as a citizen.”

Really? That’s all you have in response? No well thought out counter point, just immediately trying to shut down open dialogue when you don’t agree with what someone is saying. Go home kid, your mom has a baby bottle an a stack of puppies waiting for you.

“Lol, I should have added “reading comprehension” to the list, but that phrase is overused these days.”

Do even know how ridiculous you sound? Diversion, redirection, accusations of racism when unable to form or support a coherent argument. The same tired, old tactics, being used by uninformed progressives since the dawn of modern liberalism.

Hey now, don’t begrudge me the use of big words simply because your limited vocabulary leaves you confused by them.

You should try it sometime, your bullshitting seems to flow on
unendingly.

I know right! Seems crazy, but it’s true.

I will sigh all I want, thank you very much.

No, surprisingly enough, it’s just a dislike of people who make hypocritical posts.

*sigh* No, I really didn’t.

Maybe in your world, but here in the world of reality, no, I didn’t.

“I actually never said Trump would be an ineffective president simply because he did some coke.”

Did I say that? Let me check........no, I didn’t say that. Perhaps you should take your flare for the dramatic and enroll at a school for performing arts. What I am saying is that citing Trumps alleged cocaine use as a reason one would be a bad president doesn’t really hold water when Clinton is alleged to have used

“Shit has nothing to do with his coke habit.”

The irony of your statement is the the words “Trump” and “Hillary Clinton” are interchangeable and work equally well in the context.

Yes, and he also signed the repeal of Glass-Steagall, which was a stupid thing to do, and he had to be dragged kicking and screaming to sign Welfare reform, but who am I to judge. There are failures and successes in every presidency, but I’m didn’t come here to debate your opinion on whether Clinton was an effective

Yes, but as Fredalicious stated before, you’re accusing Trump of using cocaine without an direct proof. There’s first hand knowledge of Clinton’s alleged cocaine use. You are obviously judging Trumps ability to execute presidential responsibility based on alleged cocaine use, yet Clinton is alleged to have used

Exactly. There is no point, however it does reiterate how progressive media criticizes the failings, or alleged failings of those that oppose them, when those that support a progressive agenda are routinely guilty of those same actions, but are never called out on it.