plissken77
Plissken77
plissken77

Well, she does wear pant suits...

“Nobody needs to, the campaign is enough

Way to generalize a lot of people. Do you actually interact with enough Trump supporters even to validate that statement, or is associating with people who don’t meet your lofty standards beneath you?

Obviously this won’t be what we see reported by media outlets in the US, because it doesn’t fit the narrative being spoon fed to the media by politicians on the left, that cops are bloodthirsty and just itching to shoot minorities.

Ha!

Well, there is precedent for Hillary rigging an election, so....

Yes, afraid of ending up like Vince Foster and an incredibly long list of former Clinton associates.

So is most of the American public, but the media in the US is totally in the bag for Hillary so we either won’t be seeing it reported, or it will be labeled “old news” that we should just move past.

How much of Canada is actually inhabitable? Something like 50% of the population lives within spitting distance of the US border.

So what if it’s Russian hackers? If we were to know beyond a shadow of a doubt, which we don’t, that Russian hackers leaked the DNC emails to Assange, it won’t change the fact that Hillary colluded with the DNC and major media outlets in the US to steel the Democratic primary election. If it wasn’t so pathetic, it

No, but Hillary Clinton rigging the Democratic primary election is.

At this point, what difference does it make?

It’s hard to take you seriously when I can see that you haven’t actually ever done any research into the Clinton political machine.

Hillary has been doing shady and or illegal things since her days working on the Watergate investigation...which she was fired from for unethical practices.

“I mean, I’m sure you vetted it as a journalist”

Because you know, every 3rd party politician should automatically be equated with Hitler.

Considering the frequency at which that the term “racist” gets thrown down these days, he may have a point. I’ve been called racist because I don’t support Hillary Clinton...hell I don’t even support Trump, I simply had a different world view than the other person.

The problem isn’t necessarily with them filtering, but filtering while claiming to be impartial. If they openly disclosed that they would filter anything they deemed abusive or hateful, this wouldn’t be as big an issue.

Your analogy is not a good one. Hillary or any other candidate wouldn’t have hecklers removed? Are they just supposed to stand there and accommodate jerks screaming over them while they give a speech? Wake up.

Context is your friend...except for when you’re trying to make an argument by using something out of context...then context is your enemy.