I never understood why people do that. Why is it so important to them, when they are happy going slow, that nobody actually pass them. It is fucking dangerous, and stupid. Stupidly dangerous, or dangerously stupid, but it ought to be illegal. 

You are lucky to be alive, luckier than you deserve.

You win. Close the damn comments section, we’re not getting more gold than this. 

Marvel taking a bad idea, and committing it to screen? Inconceivable!

I had an old Ford Capri, UK Driver, in the early nineties. That was dumb enough, it was ten years old easily and mostly rust, but I liked to play a little game called how fast can I go around this corner. There was a sharp ninety degree bend in the road, it was the countryside, so nothing but hedges and ditches either…

Us Ork boyz are da fun guys, WAAAGH!

They can. If they were minded that way. Plus, if one Loki did it then any variants of Loki can decide they want to fight to become the omni-god too. Kangs variants fought for that prize, they wrote an off ramp for Loki variants to step into that role too. 

People have been paid off even for not having a hope in hell of having a case before. It has been a common tactic in Hollywood for decades. That is probably why this guy tried it.

He was probably hoping that Amazon wouldn’t want the hassle of going to court and would settle by giving him a couple of grand to fuck off and go away, or just buy it themselves to get rid of it. Which was not all that unreasonable an expectation, because other studios have done that sort of shit in the past. It can…

Red wunz go fasta

Marvel has gotta finish calling Tom Hiddleston’s agent before commenting, to see about this whole Kang Loki saga for the next MCU phase they’ve got going with a time war.

I believe the Tau have perpetrated the least amount of warcrimes.

Cavil has the true heroic build needed for one very specific heroic role of a hero.

Packard does sound cool. 

You do not know how libel laws work, do you?

All of them.

The closer you get to the present, the more people who are still alive and can sue you if you misrepresent them there are. Twenty years is about as close as they could go. Even then we had to skip over a lot of juicy stuff, Burrell for example, to avoid the lawyers. 

His lawyers aren’t comfortable with it, he means. Bringing it uptodate means potentially treading on the toes of people who are still alive and have their own lawyers. You couldn’t touch the whole Paul Burrell scandal, for a start. Which is a shame, because the guy is slimy as fuck and clearly had his own hand in…

Is it really gibberish, or is it really:

Is it seeking The Creator?