A well-designed website should not expose it's users data, above all.

@DustyButt: Oh, seems I'm out of date! :)

@marko94114: Gawker, not Giz, but any online presence of their size should have known better.

@marko94114: It's Gawker, not Giz, but really any online presence of this size should know better.

@HeartBurnKid: Agent of R.O.A.C.H.: If you find out how, let me know. Fool me once...

@ytkliu: "Thanks and good work on the quick and professional response to the whole issue"

@tylerbrainerd: According to Gnosis, it was trivial.

@trois: Not surprising, don't know what US laws are regarding this but in the UK we have something called the Data Protection Act. If Gawker's security was sufficiently negligent they could easily face charges.

@CaffineFreakUs: Not like they had much choice.

I've always kept a password for sites I trust, and a site for those I don't. Guess what category Gawker was in.

@Thangka: "There was a lady some years ago that went there on motorcycle that did a pretty nice story/pictorial on the state of Chernobyl. Wish I remembered where that was. "

@DustyButt: "There were very few signs of life at all"

Wow, sign me up.

@ttringle: 'Pompous ass', that's a first.

@Geisrud:-

@Sturm: Nah, they come pre-filled. No one ever wins one ;)

@cheeseycom: Cool. Well I'd like to see them in either case. Sounds like some of the old Star Trek sets :)

@Rartemass: Die in a vacuum or die in a vacuum with a spear through your leg? Real Hobson's choice there.

@canont2ilover: Perhaps they were formed underground and exposed?

@cheeseycom: I don't know, temperature aside wikipedia cites 4.5-6Gpa for creating a diamond, but Jupiter's 'surface' is 20–200Kpa.