Explore our other sites
  • jalopnik
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    pjc-old
    pjc
    pjc-old

    @Vebyast: "and don't even try on anything you want to run indoors"

    @Tyrunn: If you read the article, it's clear they meant superlative.

    I think those guys (TechRadar) need a new copy checker:

    I wonder how it sounds?

    @HK-47: Don't hate the player, hate the game ;)

    @Vebyast: We used to use SICK Lidars on our robots, they were damn expensive (And enormous!)

    @Dreamwriter:"What you're missing is the two things - one, that IR light isn't just a light, it puts a spread of thousands upon thousands of tiny IR dots of varying brightnesses all throughout the room"

    @NoelVeiga: And what's that stream provide that you couldn't get from two webcam's and a few IR bits'n'bobs for a fraction of the cost?

    @Dreamwriter: Am I missing something here? Two cheap cameras, one with an IR filter and a resonabley powerful IR light = $150? Why not just make a generic one instead of trying to hack MS's? I would have thought you're mostly paying for the tracking software.

    @Vebyast: From wikipedia: "The depth sensor consists of an infrared projector combined with a monochrome CMOS sensor, and allows the Kinect sensor to see in 3D under any ambient light conditions"

    You guys should put a warning on post derived from a story in the Mail, they're the epitome of sensationalist (and you don't want Giz tarred with that brush, do you?)

    @Neopolis: Those hands are quite amazing