What a compliance nonsense. Absolutely no appeal.

This is so stupid tbh. I am part of the community of Porsche owners for decades and I would say it is completely other way round. Usually only people dreaming about owning these are non critical and you usually find it out in like seconds - they are absolutely not seeing things that truly matters to real customers.

Well, judging the realibility from any of these stats is hugely misleading. Porsches are not amazingly reliable cars at all, I had like 150 cars in my life and Porsche are one of the worst in these terms. It is not exactly bad, but problems are common and are more often the older the car is.

Exactly this. As a customer residing like 250 kms from Zuffenhausen I was shown the facelift privately in May and my first reaction was: Golf! It seems so much cheaper. And I would add: Deleting the rear seats as standard (surely a cost/CO2 cutting measure) is next fail. I get lot of people don’t need it, but at the…

You apparently did not get it at all. It will be even worse with all this tech. Turbo S is very complicated car, expensive to maintain, but it is a plain and cheap one compared to this...

BMW 3 E46, anytime. 330i, M3, still megacool cars.

Nah, this article is dumb. I am buying Porsches for decades, but not in the way I get new one every 2 or 3 years, but usually owning 2-3 cars from different eras for 10+ years. And I can tell you it is quite financially challenging to keep them runinng at their best. And it may be quite simple types like last Carrera…

And they copied the steering wheel too...

Wrong, only Switzerland and Finland could impose fines based on income. And it is perceived as highly controversial matter even here in Europe because this is not how fines should work. Definitely not Germany and Austria as I work there, not in France, at least not in a way like percentage of anything.

This take is such a joke.

It has been virtually the same in web magazines since 10-20 years ago. So... Welcome to the party!

I feel for you and for him too of course. Nobody knowing this personally can not even imagine what it means in reality and many are saying total BS in this discussion.

It must be the whole Jalopnik vehicle.

Yeah, OK and what? We use the second one in Europe and it is still the same, just different mathematical view on the very same thing. I don’t know how this should help, some countries here still often use kilometers per liter, still the same...

Good luck doing this around Nürburging every now and then. You apparently have not ever been any close to this area...

So 3 laps? What a revolution!

Gay... Oh wait.

C’mon, this is a legal jargon, it has its purpose. Probably to avoid being characterized as a mass layoff, which usually has its own rules (notice for some time in advance etc.).

I would accept if they say it is offensive and goodbye. But accepting FU TRMP and rejecting this nonsense is clearly a political stance that should not be acceptable by any means.

Well, what about putting your leg in first?