Maybe they thought it was a Porsche 928?

Did you even your comment?

They have a pact with Satan, that's how.

I dunno, having your diet consisting for a third out of Pizza also sounds pretty dumb.

Pro: they make you look like you have cartoon feet.

A brand and link might be useful.

That's what you get when you stick your nose in someone else's business.

The iPad has 'next gen' specs, as in, half a year ahead. First, the A5x is an evolution of the A5 the same way the A5 was of the A4 and the Pentium 3 was on the Pentium 2. Second, in October, the iPhone will have the same CPU. That's what I mean when I say "pretty much the same guts".

It's still listed under Tablets: [www.bestbuy.com]

You're right, it leans a bit more towards apple, still. I'm not horribly far off though - here's the latest graph I can find, Q4 2011, data via iSupply.

.

.

That nanoSIM is -so- prone to being inserted incorrectly.

Your post makes no sense. Those who are on a budget would actually keep using the iPad 2 because the new screen negates the processor and memory bumps.

*reply to promote*

What I want is an ultrabook/tablet combination. Slider keyboard for the win. Touchscreens are great, but I want that physical keyboard.

Amount of feature and level of refinement have little to do with eachother. Refinement is about how well the parts of the 'machine' work together - not about how many parts there are.

I'd like (but am sure will never get) a sliding keyboard, like the EEE slider.

I think the idea was that the camera isn't interesting enough to be used to actually take pictures with, and as such should have been placed on the front instead.

They have the top, but they're losing it pretty fast. If I'm right, the market share is now split about 45-55. And while I agree with your strategy, the thing is: there's no killer feature ahead of it, not that I can think of anyway, that's not already implemented.