The only valid reason to be a celebrity is to hang out with Hiddleston. Not the money, not the fame, not even the hot dates (unless we're dating Hiddleston. That's okay.)

The baby had one or two tiny scratches that did not require medical attention. That was the extent of the cat's 'attack'. People have been blowing a warning swat (normal cat behaviour) out of proportion and labeled Lux as crazy/psychotic/shitty/etc. The father later kicked Lux across the freaking room, and only then…

I just started watching random episodes. Which one is that from?

You should get a nanny cam to see what your dog gets up to while you're away.

I don't want to body snark people who might have some deep issues (or not, it's all cool), but it looks like trying to smile is actually causing them pain. Before it got to this point, someone should have pulled them aside and told them to go to Korea.

Seriously wondering this too. They just throw it all back up, like cats.

I was feeling all bleh until this article. Now I'm both covetous of the pretty dresses and mildly turned on by Maggie and Ashley.

It's Jesus-chick, duh.

Where is the full video? TELL ME1!!!

Buy some poison and invite your neighbours over for drinks.

I don't understand why you're saying he's reliable yet also saying he's wrong. Sunan Abu Dawud wrote that the hadith about FGM wasn't reliable. The guy who wrote the Huff post article didn't make it up.

Kinja is not behaving for me. There is also this article

I was actually reading

Not all hadiths are considered equal, though. That particular one from Sunan Abu Dawud is considered by Muslim scholars to be of questionable authenticity.

You mean, RAWRRRR

Exactly, and people are reporting it as if the cat went nuts and jumped the baby to maul it. It was just a warning swat, which is totally normal cat behaviour after its tail is pulled. That was the extent of the 'attack' but the father decided to kick the cat across the room afterwards, not at the time of the…

This cat wasn't vicious, though. The baby pulled its tail and it swatted a warning in response. If it had truly meant to hurt the child, the baby would have required stitches, instead of the very small scratches he ended up with that required no medical attention whatsoever. The father admitted to kicking the cat…

The cat only gave a warning scratch after the baby pulled its tail, which is completely normal behaviour. The father admitted to kicking the cat ACROSS THE ROOM afterwards, when the cat wasn't even on the baby at that point, which is not normal behaviour.

The cat gave a warning scratch after the baby pulled its tail. That was it. The father admitted to kicking the cat across the room after the fact, some time after the cat was no longer on the baby.

The father said he kicked the cat across the room, AFTER the fact. The cat wasn't even on the baby at that point.