pinkdrink23
pinkdrink23
pinkdrink23

Sort of. Except “ghosting” on the person you live with and have 3 children with isn’t really like, “ghosting” so much as “walking out the door leaving reams of psychological issues behind you, as opposed to just emotionally confusing one adult.” So I would actually say no, not ghosting. Just regular asshole-ing.

Isn’t that that ghosting shit?

If your boyfriend left home a month ago and hasn’t been home since he dumped you a month ago.

Let’s play a game. It’s called Reasons Why This is Sexist, Not the Product of Capitalism.

We are better off than a lot of people in a lot of countries. I don’t want to get all Lee Greenwood on y’all, but the fact someone can type “garbage country” on an unrestricted internet which people can read on free WiFi in a public library kinda disproves the point.

One of these kids has autism. One doesn't. Both are completely & totally up to date on all required vaccines. (And they're both my gorgeous boys...)

joe lookin FOINE

You do know that thiomersal was an extremely effective and safe preservative and the uncritical and unscientific hysteria over it actually caused the deaths of infants and children which makes people who spread the unsubstantiated fear mongering bullshit about it the actual public health hazard. People like you, in

I wonder if Bennifer 1.0 will make their comeback.

So far my parenting policy has been to always answer questions honestly as they come up. So when my 5 year old asks why I won’t buy her something, I always talk about why. The answer can usually be summed up as “because you don’t need it, because it’s wiser to save (whatever amount of money) or use it on something

You should try the cream of Sum Yung Guy. It’s phenomenal.

folks are cleverly infecting anti-vaccination activists with computer viruses embedded in photos and links.

This is why I hate the song “Jolene.” I mean, it’s a lovely song to listen to! But everything it says is just so fucked up and wrong. Not least because, for the love of god, if the only way you can keep your “man” is to beg other women not to have sex with him, he is seriously not worth keeping.

I read something a few weeks ago that essentially said the biggest point of the argument is simply the fact that we call religious “marriage” and legal “marriage” the same term. Religious folks assume with you say marriage you are discussing the religious ritual rather than the legal aspects. It’s pretty ridiculous,

You’d think that a man who teaches World History would be able to spell Kristallnacht correctly.

... come sit by me.

Is it though? No one is rounding up priests, pastors, rabbi’s, imam’s (not that anyone screaming “religious liberties” really cares what Muslims want/think) & making them perform gay marriages. The only thing that changes is that same sex couples can be issued marriage licenses & enjoy all the benefits that come with

SCOTUS isn’t making pastors marry gay couples in church, it’s just saying city hall needs if issue a marriage license. Let’s all chill out on the whole ‘religious freedoms’ freak out.

I wonder if he likes fishsticks?